A variable weight approach for evidential reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
Lei-lei Chang
Meng-jun Li
Jiang Jiang
机构
[1] National University of Defense Technology,College of Information System and Management
[2] University of Birmingham,Department of Mathematics
来源
关键词
probability deficiency; evidential reasoning (ER); inadequate information; variable weight; consensus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A variable weight approach was proposed to handle the probability deficiency problem in the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. The probability deficiency problem indicated that the inadequate information in the assessment result should be less than that in the input. However, it was proved that under certain circumstances, the ER approach could not solve the probability deficiency problem. The variable weight approach was based on two assumptions: 1) the greater weight should be given to the rule with more adequate information; 2) the greater weight should be given to the rules with less disparate information. Assessment results of two notional case studies show that 1) the probability deficiency problem is solved using the proposed variable weight approach, and 2) the information with less inadequacy and more disparity is provided for the decision makers to help reach a consensus.
引用
收藏
页码:2202 / 2211
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A variable weight approach for evidential reasoning
    Chang Lei-lei
    Li Meng-jun
    Jiang Jiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2013, 20 (08) : 2202 - 2211
  • [2] A variable weight approach for evidential reasoning
    常雷雷
    李孟军
    姜江
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20 (08) : 2202 - 2211
  • [3] Uncertainties in TCSP - Evidential reasoning approach
    Bhavani, SD
    Pujari, AK
    Sattar, A
    [J]. FUSION 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF INFORMATION FUSION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 463 - 470
  • [4] Evidential network model and reasoning approach
    Jiang, Jiang
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (04): : 984 - 990
  • [5] An argumentation model of evidential reasoning with variable degrees of justification
    Liang, QingYin
    Wei, Bin
    [J]. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2012), 2012, 250 : 71 - 80
  • [6] Evidential reasoning approach with multiple kinds of attributes and entropy-based weight assignment
    Zhou, Mi
    Liu, Xin-Bao
    Yang, Jian-Bo
    Chen, Yu-Wang
    Wu, Jian
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2019, 163 : 358 - 375
  • [7] A software trustworthiness evaluation model using objective weight based evidential reasoning approach
    Ding, Shuai
    Ma, Xi-Jun
    Yang, Shan-Lin
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 33 (01) : 171 - 189
  • [8] A software trustworthiness evaluation model using objective weight based evidential reasoning approach
    Shuai Ding
    Xi-Jun Ma
    Shan-Lin Yang
    [J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2012, 33 : 171 - 189
  • [9] Combination of Classifiers With Optimal Weight Based on Evidential Reasoning
    Liu, Zhun-Ga
    Pan, Quan
    Dezert, Jean
    Martin, Arnaud
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 26 (03) : 1217 - 1230
  • [10] Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Elhag, Taha M. S.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (01) : 689 - 699