Environmental life cycle assessment of Indian coal-fired power plants

被引:16
|
作者
Singh U. [1 ]
Sharma N. [1 ]
Mahapatra S.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; Coal-fired power plants; Environmental impact; Flue gas desulfurization; Life cycle assessment; Plant inventory;
D O I
10.1007/s40789-016-0136-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coal is the backbone of the Indian power sector. The coal-fired power plants remain the largest emitters of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and substantial amounts of nitrogen oxides, which are associated with climate and health impacts. Various CO2 mitigation technologies (carbon capture and storage—CCS) and SO2/NOx mitigation technologies (flue gas desulfurization and selective catalytic reduction) have been employed to reduce the environmental impacts of the coal-fired power plants. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the feasibility of various mitigation technologies employed. This paper attempts to perform environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Indian coal-fired power plant with and without CO2, SO2 and NOx mitigation controls. The study develops new normalization factors for India in various damage categories, using the Indian emissions and energy consumption data, coupled with the emissions and particulate emission to come up with a final environmental impact of coal-fired electricity. The results show a large degree of dependence on the perspective of assessment used. The impact of sensitivities of individual substances and the effect of plant efficiency on the final LCA results is also studied. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 225
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China
    Wang, Jinman
    Wang, Ruogu
    Zhu, Yucheng
    Li, Jiayan
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 115 : 374 - 384
  • [2] Review of Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Coal-fired Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Storage
    Zhang, Jingheng
    Basson, Lauren
    Leach, Matthew
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE POWER GENERATION AND SUPPLY, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2108 - +
  • [3] VOC emissions of coal-fired power plants in China based on life cycle assessment method
    Peng, Ya
    Yang, Qing
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Shuo
    Li, Junting
    Zhang, Xiong
    Zhang, Shihong
    Zhao, Haibo
    Zhang, Bo
    Wang, Changqing
    Bartocci, Pietro
    Fantozzi, Francesco
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 292
  • [4] A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant
    M. Mann
    P. Spath
    [J]. Clean Products and Processes, 2001, 3 (2): : 81 - 91
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of a cleaner supercritical coal-fired power plant
    Rasheed, Rizwan
    Javed, Hajra
    Rizwan, Asfra
    Sharif, Faiza
    Yasar, Abdullah
    Tabinda, Amtul Bari
    Ahmad, Sajid Rashid
    Wang, Yubo
    Su, Yuehong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of a Coal-fired Old Thermal Power Plant
    Mbohwa, Charles
    [J]. WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING - WCE 2013, VOL I, 2013, : 532 - 541
  • [7] Energy management and life cycle assessment of efficient and flexible trigeneration system for coal-fired power plants
    Su, Zixiang
    Yang, Liu
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 217
  • [8] Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Peter Pauls
    [J]. 热力透平, 2004, (02) : 105 - 107
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in saline aquifers for coal-fired power generation: An Indian scenario
    Gupta, Abhishek
    Paul, Akshoy Ranjan
    Haque, Nawshad
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 13 (01): : 81 - 98
  • [10] Coal-Fired Power Plants Alternative Petcoke Fired Power Plants
    Ozcelik, Ozlem
    Boran, Kurtulus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (04): : 531 - 535