The Relationship of Socioeconomic Status to Preterm Contractions and Preterm Delivery

被引:0
|
作者
Nedra S. Whitehead
机构
[1] RTI International,
[2] Social,undefined
[3] Statistical,undefined
[4] and Environmental Sciences,undefined
[5] Statistics and Epidemiology,undefined
来源
关键词
Premature obstetric labor; Uterine contractions; Premature birth; Socioeconomic status;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spontaneous preterm labor precedes approximately 50% of preterm births. One to 10% of pregnant women are hospitalized for preterm labor. This study examines the relationship of socioeconomic indicators, family income, education and type of insurance, with preterm contractions and subsequent preterm delivery. Data were from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system on 107,926 women who had singleton births during 2000–2002. Data on preterm contractions, family income, and type of insurance during pregnancy were from the maternal questionnaire. Maternal education and gestational age were derived from birth certificate data. Predicted marginal probabilities from logistic regression models were used to calculate the adjusted cumulative incidence and cumulative risk ratio of preterm contractions and preterm delivery. Median annual household income was approximately $30,000. More than one-fourth (28.1 95% CI: 27.7, 28.6) of women experienced preterm contractions, and these women were 3 times as likely (18 vs. 5%) to deliver preterm as women without preterm contractions. Only 58% of women who delivered preterm reported contractions. Lower income and Medicaid-paid care were independently associated with an increased risk of preterm contractions but not with preterm delivery. The association of lower income and Medicaid enrollment with preterm contractions but not preterm delivery suggests that SES is associated with the initiation of the pathway to spontaneous preterm delivery rather than access to or the success of interventions to prevent delivery following the onset of contractions.
引用
收藏
页码:1645 / 1656
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Relationship of Socioeconomic Status to Preterm Contractions and Preterm Delivery
    Whitehead, Nedra S.
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2012, 16 (08) : 1645 - 1656
  • [2] Differences in Psychosocial Protective Factors by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status and Their Relationship to Preterm Delivery
    Zamani-Hank, Yasamean
    Margerison, Claire E.
    Talge, Nicole M.
    Holzman, Claudia
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH REPORTS, 2022, 3 (01): : 243 - 255
  • [3] The socioeconomic impact of preterm delivery
    Gill, A
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY OF PARTURITION: BASIC SCIENCE AND CLINICAL APPLICATION, 2001, 27 : 1 - 9
  • [4] Socioeconomic disparities in the prevalence of preterm contractions.
    Whitehead, NS
    Johnson, C
    Callaghan, W
    Williams, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 161 (11) : S116 - S116
  • [5] Preterm Cognitive outcome and socioeconomic status
    Kraegeloh-Mann, Ingeborg
    Lidzba, Karen
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2012, 101 (06) : 557 - 558
  • [6] Tocolysis of preterm contractions does not improve preterm delivery rate or perinatal outcomes
    Sciscione, AC
    Stamilio, DM
    Manley, JS
    Shlossman, PA
    Gorman, RT
    Colmorgen, GHC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1998, 15 (03) : 177 - 181
  • [7] Maternal underweight status and association with preterm contractions
    Teresa Tam
    Michael Muresan
    Neal Ipema
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 286 : 35 - 36
  • [8] Maternal underweight status and association with preterm contractions
    Tam, Teresa
    Muresan, Michael
    Ipema, Neal
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (01) : 35 - 36
  • [9] Preterm contractions in community settings: II. Predicting preterm birth in women with preterm contractions
    Hueston, WJ
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (01): : 43 - 46
  • [10] Neighborhood socioeconomic status, maternal race and preterm delivery: A case-control study
    Pickett, KE
    Ahern, JE
    Selvin, S
    Abrams, B
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (06) : 410 - 418