Network models and biproportional rounding for fair seat allocations in the UK elections

被引:0
|
作者
Kerem Akartunalı
Philip A. Knight
机构
[1] University of Strathclyde,Department of Management Science
[2] University of Strathclyde,Department of Mathematics and Statistics
来源
关键词
Fair seat allocation; Networks and graphs; Biproportional matrices; Integer programming;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Systems for allocating seats in an election offer a number of socially and mathematically interesting problems. We discuss how to model the allocation process as a network flow problem, and propose a wide choice of objective functions and allocation schemes. Biproportional rounding, which is an instance of the network flow problem, is used in some European countries with multi-seat constituencies. We discuss its application to single seat constituencies and the inevitable consequence that seats are allocated to candidates with little local support. However, we show that variants can be selected, such as regional apportionment, to mitigate this problem. In particular, we introduce a parameter based family of methods, which we call balanced majority voting, that can be tuned to meet the public’s demand for local and global “fairness”. Using data from the 2010 to 2015 UK general elections, we study a variety of network models and implementations of biproportional rounding, and address conditions of existence and uniqueness.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:18
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Network models and biproportional rounding for fair seat allocations in the UK elections
    Akartunali, Kerem
    Knight, Philip A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 253 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [2] Economic interest group allocations in open-seat senate elections
    Gaddie, RK
    Regens, JL
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICS QUARTERLY, 1997, 25 (03): : 347 - 362
  • [3] Socially fair network design via iterative rounding
    Laddha, Aditi
    Singh, Mohit
    Vempala, Santosh S.
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 50 (05) : 536 - 540
  • [4] Facebook, the Conservatives and the Risk to Fair and Open Elections in the UK
    Moore, Martin
    [J]. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2016, 87 (03): : 424 - 430
  • [5] Weighted proportional fair rate allocations in a differentiated services network
    Lee, CL
    Chen, CW
    Chen, YC
    [J]. IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, E85B (01) : 116 - 128
  • [6] NETWORK MODELS FOR SEAT ALLOCATION ON FLIGHTS
    DROR, M
    TRUDEAU, P
    LADANY, SP
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1988, 22 (04) : 239 - 250
  • [7] Fully Tally-Hiding Verifiable E-Voting for Real-World Elections with Seat-Allocations
    Wabartha, Carmen
    Liedtke, Julian
    Huber, Nicolas
    Rausch, Daniel
    Kuesters, Ralf
    [J]. COMPUTER SECURITY - ESORICS 2023, PT I, 2024, 14344 : 209 - 228
  • [8] The UK DNA banking network: a "fair access" biobank
    Yuille, Martin
    Dixon, Katherine
    Platt, Andrew
    Pullum, Simon
    Lewis, David
    Hall, Alistair
    Ollier, William
    [J]. CELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 2010, 11 (03) : 241 - 251
  • [9] The UK DNA banking network: a “fair access” biobank
    Martin Yuille
    Katherine Dixon
    Andrew Platt
    Simon Pullum
    David Lewis
    Alistair Hall
    William Ollier
    [J]. Cell and Tissue Banking, 2010, 11 : 241 - 251
  • [10] Designing optimal allocations for cancer screening using queuing network models
    Dean, Justin
    Goldberg, Evan
    Michor, Franziska
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 18 (05)