How we collaborate: characterizing, modeling and predicting scientific collaborations

被引:0
|
作者
Xiaoling Sun
Hongfei Lin
Kan Xu
Kun Ding
机构
[1] Dalian University of Technology,School of Public Administration and Law
[2] Dalian University of Technology,School of Computer Science
来源
Scientometrics | 2015年 / 104卷
关键词
Scientific collaboration; Network model; Link prediction; Collaboration behavior;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The large amounts of publicly available bibliographic repositories on the web provide us great opportunities to study the scientific behaviors of scholars. This paper aims to study the way we collaborate, model the dynamics of collaborations and predict future collaborations among authors. We investigate the collaborations in three disciplines including physics, computer science and information science,and different kinds of features which may influence the creation of collaborations. Path-based features are found to be particularly useful in predicting collaborations. Besides, the combination of path-based and attribute-based features achieves almost the same performance as the combination of all features considered. Inspired by the findings, we propose an agent-based model to simulate the dynamics of collaborations. The model merges the ideas of network structure and node attributes by leveraging random walk mechanism and interests similarity. Empirical results show that the model could reproduce a number of realistic and critical network statistics and patterns. We further apply the model to predict collaborations in an unsupervised manner and compare it with several state-of-the-art approaches. The proposed model achieves the best predictive performance compared with the random baseline and other approaches. The results suggest that both network structure and node attributes may play an important role in shaping the evolution of collaboration networks.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 60
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How we collaborate: characterizing, modeling and predicting scientific collaborations
    Sun, Xiaoling
    Lin, Hongfei
    Xu, Kan
    Ding, Kun
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 104 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [2] Scientific Collaborations: How Do We Measure the Return on Relationships?
    Fair, Jeanne M.
    Stokes, Martha Mangum
    Pennington, Deana
    Mendenhall, Ian H.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 4
  • [3] How Experiments Begin: The Formation of Scientific Collaborations
    Joel Genuth
    Ivan Chompalov
    Wesley Shrum
    [J]. Minerva, 2000, 38 : 311 - 348
  • [4] How experiments begin: The formation of scientific collaborations
    Genuth, J
    Chompalov, I
    Shrum, W
    [J]. MINERVA, 2000, 38 (03) : 311 - 348
  • [5] Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Academia: Modeling the Roles of Perceived Contextual Norms and Motivation to Collaborate
    Manata, Brian
    Bozeman, Jessica
    Boynton, Karen
    Neal, Zachary
    [J]. COMMUNICATION STUDIES, 2024, 75 (01) : 40 - 58
  • [6] COPD COHORT STUDY: HOW CAN WE COLLABORATE?
    Kim, D. K.
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2015, 20 : 8 - 8
  • [7] Predicting Scientific Creativity: The Role of Adversity, Collaborations, and Work Strategies
    Barrett, Jamie D.
    Vessey, William B.
    Griffith, Jennifer A.
    Mracek, Derek
    Mumford, Michael D.
    [J]. CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2014, 26 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [8] Bioanalytical laboratory automation development: why should we and how could we collaborate?
    Li, Ming
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2015, 7 (02) : 153 - 155
  • [9] How good are we at predicting
    不详
    [J]. PAPERI JA PUU-PAPER AND TIMBER, 2003, 85 (07): : 385 - 385
  • [10] ZOO-ACADEMIC RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS - HOW CLOSE ARE WE
    POUGH, FH
    [J]. HERPETOLOGICA, 1993, 49 (04) : 500 - 508