Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?

被引:0
|
作者
Simona Gentile-Lüdecke
Rui Torres de Oliveira
Justin Paul
机构
[1] Reinhold-Würth-Hochschule,Heilbronn University of Applied Sciences
[2] Campus Künzelsau,Business School
[3] Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship,undefined
[4] Queensland University of Technology,undefined
[5] University of Puerto Rico,undefined
来源
Small Business Economics | 2020年 / 55卷
关键词
Open innovation; SMEs; Evolutionary theory of organizations; Organizational structure; M10; L26;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the evolutionary theory of the firm, this paper examines how traditional variables that describe a firm’s organizational structure—formalization, specialization, and centralization—affect the adoption of inbound and outbound open innovation. Using a cross-sectional survey of Chinese small and medium enterprises, our study shows that organizational structure matters for open innovation and that formalization, specialization, and centralization have diverse effects on the OI practices implemented by SMEs. Results indicate that specialization and centralization have a critical role in open innovation practices as they both foster the use of inbound and outbound open innovation. Formalization negatively affects outbound, but it is positively associated with inbound open innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1112
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs?
    Gentile-Luedecke, Simona
    Torres de Oliveira, Rui
    Paul, Justin
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 55 (04) : 1091 - 1112
  • [2] Inbound and Outbound Open Innovation in Clusters
    Xu, Yin-jie
    Zheng, Jian-zhuang
    [J]. 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT: MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INNOVATION, 2013, : 667 - 676
  • [3] Influence of inbound and outbound open innovation practices on performance of firms: an evidence from Indian product SMEs
    Sriram, K. V.
    Hungund, Sumukh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (05) : 750 - 767
  • [4] Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?
    Cassiman, Bruno
    Valentini, Giovanni
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (06) : 1034 - 1046
  • [5] The Impact of Inbound and Outbound Open Innovations: Empirical Evidence for SMEs across Europe
    Radicic, Dragana
    Pugh, Geoff
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ECIE 2014), 2014, : 368 - 375
  • [6] The Effect of Open Innovation Implementation on Small Firms' Propensity for Inbound and Outbound Open Innovation Practices
    Naruetharadhol, P.
    Srisathan, W. A.
    Ketkaew, C.
    [J]. MODERN MANAGEMENT BASED ON BIG DATA I (MMBD 2020), 2020, 329 : 30 - 40
  • [7] Commitment-based HRM and inbound open innovation in SMEs: the role of organizational trust and developmental culture
    Cera, Elona
    Cera, Gentjan
    Elezi, Enis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS-PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 11 (03) : 659 - 679
  • [8] The effects of inbound open innovation, outbound open innovation, and team role diversity on open source software project performance
    Tang, Tanya Ya
    Fisher, Gregory J.
    Qualls, William J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 94 : 216 - 228
  • [9] Inbound open innovation in SMEs: A microfoundations perspective of dynamic capabilities
    Rhaiem, Khalil
    Doloreux, David
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 199
  • [10] Empirical Evidence of Inbound Open Innovation Practice by Ghanaian SMEs
    Sarpong, Eric Ohemeng
    Yunfei, Shao
    Coffie, Cephas Paa Kwasi
    Akrong, Godwin Banafo
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):