The Quality of Domestic Legal Institutions and Export PerformanceTheory and Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Jing Li
Ilan Vertinsky
Hua Zhang
机构
[1] Beedie School of Business,Department of Finance and Accounting
[2] Simon Fraser University,undefined
[3] Sauder School of Business,undefined
[4] University of British Columbia,undefined
[5] China Europe International Business School,undefined
来源
关键词
Institution; Quality of law; Export; Ownership types; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Does the quality of domestic legal institutions matter for export performance? How does differential access to protections and privileges offered by informal institutions moderate the relationship between the quality of formal legal institutions and export performance? To answer these questions, we develop a theoretical framework drawing on insights from trade theory and institutional theory.We propose that higher-quality legal systems in an exporter’s location are associated with higher export performance, particularly when trade partners face higher levels of external and internal uncertainty. We further propose that firms that have less access to local informal institutions to reduce transaction costs and opportunism benefit more from better-developed legal institutions.Using information for more than 198,000 firms and legal quality information for 120 cities in China, we find strong support for our predictions. We discuss our contributions to the literature on institutions and export.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 390
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Quality of Domestic Legal Institutions and Export Performance Theory and Evidence from China
    Li, Jing
    Vertinsky, Ilan
    Zhang, Hua
    [J]. MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2013, 53 (03) : 361 - 390
  • [2] Domestic institutions and export performance: Evidence for Cambodia
    Soeng, Reth
    Cuyvers, Ludo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 27 (04): : 389 - 408
  • [3] Information accessibility and export quality: Evidence from China
    Li, Guangzhong
    Ding, Hui
    Jia, Fansheng
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 32 (02) : 480 - 509
  • [4] FOREIGN ENTRY LIBERALIZATION AND EXPORT QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Hou, Xinyu
    Shi, Yingying
    Sun, Puyang
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2021, 39 (01) : 205 - 219
  • [5] Product standards and export quality: Micro evidence from China
    Hu, Cui
    Lin, Faqin
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 145 : 274 - 277
  • [6] Will temperature affect the export quality of firms? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Junmei
    Li, Hongyi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 15 (04) : 493 - 514
  • [7] Currency overvaluation and export product quality: Evidence from China
    Kong, Dongmin
    Shi, Zheng
    Xiong, Mengxu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 93
  • [8] Export product quality and markup of firms: evidence from China
    Yue, Wen
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (53) : 6294 - 6309
  • [9] Liberalization for services FDI and export quality: Evidence from China
    Hayakawa, Kazunobu
    Mukunoki, Hiroshi
    Yang, Chih-hai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2020, 55
  • [10] Does institutional quality matter for export product quality? Evidence from China
    Lin, Yumei
    Lin, Shanlang
    Wang, Xiaowan
    Wu, Jian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 30 (07): : 1077 - 1100