Mortgage Default: Classification Trees Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
David Feldman
Shulamith Gross
机构
[1] School of Banking and Finance,The University of New South Wales
[2] UNSW,The National Science Foundation and Department of Statistics and Computer Information Systems, Bernard M. Baruch College
[3] The City University of New York,undefined
关键词
mortgage default; Classification and Regression Trees; misclassification error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We apply the powerful, flexible, and computationally efficient nonparametric Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm to analyze real estate mortgage data. CART is particularly appropriate for our data set because of its strengths in dealing with large data sets, high dimensionality, mixed data types, missing data, different relationships between variables in different parts of the measurement space, and outliers. Moreover, CART is intuitive and easy to interpret and implement. We discuss the pros and cons of CART in relation to traditional methods such as linear logistic regression, nonparametric additive logistic regression, discriminant analysis, partial least squares classification, and neural networks, with particular emphasis on real estate. We use CART to produce the first academic study of Israeli mortgage default data. We find that borrowers’ features, rather than mortgage contract features, are the strongest predictors of default if accepting icbadli borrowers is more costly than rejecting “good” ones. If the costs are equal, mortgage features are used as well. The higher (lower) the ratio of misclassification costs of bad risks versus good ones, the lower (higher) are the resulting misclassification rates of bad risks and the higher (lower) are the misclassification rates of good ones. This is consistent with real-world rejection of good risks in an attempt to avoid bad ones.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 396
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mortgage default: Classification trees analysis
    Feldman, D
    Gross, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 30 (04): : 369 - 396
  • [2] RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE DEFAULT - A CLARIFYING ANALYSIS
    WALLER, NG
    [J]. HOUSING FINANCE REVIEW, 1988, 7 (4-5): : 321 - 333
  • [3] An empirical comparison of classification algorithms for mortgage default prediction: evidence from a distressed mortgage market
    Fitzpatrick, Trevor
    Mues, Christophe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 249 (02) : 427 - 439
  • [4] Crime and residential mortgage default: an empirical analysis
    Feinberg, RM
    Nickerson, D
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 9 (04) : 217 - 220
  • [5] A Model of Mortgage Default
    Campbell, John Y.
    Cocco, Joao F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2015, 70 (04): : 1495 - 1554
  • [6] Securitization and Mortgage Default
    Ronel Elul
    [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2016, 49 : 281 - 309
  • [7] Securitization and Mortgage Default
    Elul, Ronel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 49 (2-3) : 281 - 309
  • [8] Mortgage Curtailment and Default
    Lin, Che-Chun
    Chu, Ting-Heng
    Prather, Larry J.
    Wang, Perry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE REVIEW, 2005, 8 (01): : 95 - 109
  • [9] Subprime mortgage default
    Kau, James B.
    Keenan, Donald C.
    Lyubimov, Constantine
    Slawson, V. Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (2-3) : 75 - 87
  • [10] Mortgage Default during the US Mortgage Crisis
    Schelkle, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2018, 50 (06) : 1101 - 1137