Human research ethics in Australia: Ethical regulation and public policy

被引:0
|
作者
Susan Dodds
机构
[1] Philosophy Program University of Wollongong,
关键词
National Statement; Ethical Conduct; Institutional Ethic Committee; Research Proposal; Monash Bioethic Review;
D O I
10.1007/BF03351236
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper critically assesses the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans as a piece of public policy concerning the regulation of research ethics. Two of the stated purposes of the National Statement are the provision of a “national reference point for ethical consideration relevant to all research involving humans” and the “protection of the welfare and rights of participants in research”. The process of Human Research Ethics Committee review of research proposals is evaluated in light of these two purposes. I argue that the approach taken in the National Statement has the potential to meet these purposes, but that, in its current form the statement does not provide sufficient guidance to HRECs to properly fulfil either purpose. For the National Statement to meet its promise, it needs to provide greater direction to HRECs which is properly informed by understanding of the full array of research involving human participants.
引用
收藏
页码:S4 / S21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ethics, ethical human research and human research ethics committees
    Lindorff, Margaret
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES REVIEW, 2010, 52 (01): : 51 - 59
  • [2] Ethical concerns in suicide research: thematic analysis of the views of human research ethics committees in Australia
    Barnard, Emma
    Dempster, Georgia
    Krysinska, Karolina
    Reifels, Lennart
    Robinson, Jo
    Pirkis, Jane
    Andriessen, Karl
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [3] Ethical concerns in suicide research: thematic analysis of the views of human research ethics committees in Australia
    Emma Barnard
    Georgia Dempster
    Karolina Krysinska
    Lennart Reifels
    Jo Robinson
    Jane Pirkis
    Karl Andriessen
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 22
  • [4] Research cloning, ethics, and public policy
    Walters, L
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5613) : 1661 - 1661
  • [5] The ethics of risk displacement in research and public policy
    Vong, Gerard
    Levinson, Meira
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2020, 34 (09) : 918 - 922
  • [6] Agricultural ethics: Research, teaching and public policy
    Campbell, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2000, 13 (3-4): : 259 - 265
  • [7] Ethical regulation and humanities research in Australia: Problems and consequences
    Robert Cribb
    [J]. Monash Bioethics Review, 2004, 23 (3) : S39 - S57
  • [8] Cyborg ethics and regulation: ethical issues of human enhancement
    Ireni-Saban, Liza
    Sherman, Maya
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 49 (01) : 42 - 53
  • [9] Ethical considerations and public policy - A ninety day exercise in practical and professional ethics: Cloning human beings
    Shapiro, HT
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 1999, 5 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [10] Putting the "Ethics" Back into Research Ethics: A Process for Ethical Reflection for Human Research Protection
    Perlman, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 37 (01) : 13 - 22