Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure

被引:0
|
作者
David Schmocker
Carmen Tanner
Johannes Katsarov
Markus Christen
机构
[1] University of Zurich,Department of Banking and Finance
[2] Zeppelin University,Leadership Excellence Institute Zeppelin
[3] University of Zurich,Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
[4] University of Zurich,Digital Society Initiative
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Moral sensitivity; Ethical sensitivity; Moral awareness; Moral competences; Moral intelligence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to manage ethical challenges in organizations and the workplace, moral sensitivity (MS)—the ability to identify and ascribe importance to moral issues when they arise in the workplace—is seen as the key prerequisite by researchers and professionals. However, despite the importance of MS, satisfactory reliable and valid measures to assess this competence are to date lacking. The present research tests the psychometric qualities of a revised MS measure for the business domain (R-MSB) that is designed to assess individual differences in moral and business-related value sensitivity. We present three different analyses with two heterogeneous samples of Swiss and German employees (total N = 1168). The first two studies provide good evidence of the measures’ factorial structure, its construct, and criteria-related validity. The third study examines how affective and empathic responses are associated with MS and business sensitivity (BS). The results support the view that empathic responsiveness enhances MS. The instrument’s theoretical and practical strengths, limitations, and avenues for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:10277 / 10291
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure
    Schmocker, David
    Tanner, Carmen
    Katsarov, Johannes
    Christen, Markus
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (12) : 10277 - 10291
  • [2] An Advanced Measure of Moral Sensitivity in Business
    Schmocker, David
    Tanner, Carmen
    Katsarov, Johannes
    Christen, Markus
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 36 (05) : 864 - 873
  • [3] Validation of the Measure of Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Constructs
    Smederevac, Snezana
    Mitrovic, Dusanka
    Colovic, Petar
    Nikolasevic, Zeljka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 35 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [4] Development of a questionnaire to measure the moral sensitivity of nursing students
    Takizawa, Miyoshi
    Ota, Katsumasa
    Maeda, Jukai
    [J]. NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 83 (03): : 477 - 493
  • [5] See no evil: moral sensitivity in the formulation of business problems
    Pedersen, Lars Jacob Tynes
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2009, 18 (04) : 335 - 348
  • [6] RATIONAL INTERACTION FOR MORAL SENSITIVITY - A POSTMODERN APPROACH TO MORAL DECISION-MAKING IN BUSINESS
    ROSSOUW, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1994, 13 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [7] Educating moral sensitivity in business: An experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of a serious moral game
    Tanner, Carmen
    Schmocker, David
    Katsarov, Johannes
    Christen, Markus
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2022, 178
  • [8] A Short Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory-RSQ17
    Colovic, Petar
    Smederevac, Snezana
    Oljaca, Milan
    Nikolasevic, Zeljka
    Mitrovic, Dusanka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 152 (03): : 133 - 150
  • [9] A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
    Reuter, Martin
    Cooper, Andrew J.
    Smillie, Luke D.
    Markett, Sebastian
    Montag, Christian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [10] Cross-cultural validation of the moral sensitivity questionnaire-revised Chinese version
    Huang, Fei Fei
    Yang, Qing
    Zhang, Jie
    Zhang, Qing Hua
    Khoshnood, Kaveh
    Zhang, Jing Ping
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2016, 23 (07) : 784 - 793