Biomarker-Defined Subgroup Selection Adaptive Design for Phase III Confirmatory Trial with Time-to-Event Data: Comparing Group Sequential and Various Adaptive Enrichment Designs

被引:1
|
作者
Tang R. [1 ]
Ma X. [2 ]
Yang H. [2 ]
Wolf M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, 50 Northern Ave, Boston, MA
[2] Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA
关键词
Adaptive enrichment designs; Bayesian predictive power; Biomarker-defined subgroup; Group sequential design; Time-to-event;
D O I
10.1007/s12561-017-9198-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Predictive and prognostic biomarkers play an important role in personalized medicine to determine strategies for drug evaluation and treatment selection. In the context of continuous biomarkers, identification of an optimal cutoff for patient selection can be challenging due to limited information on biomarker predictive value, the biomarker’s distribution in the intended use population, and the complexity of the biomarker relationship to clinical outcomes. As a result, prespecified candidate cutoffs may be rationalized based on biological and practical considerations. In this context, adaptive enrichment designs have been proposed with interim decision rules to select a biomarker-defined subpopulation to optimize study performance. With a group sequential design as a reference, the performance of several proposed adaptive designs are evaluated and compared under various scenarios (e.g., sample size, study power, enrichment effects) where type I error rates are well controlled through closed testing procedures and where subpopulation selections are based upon the predictive probability of trial success. It is found that when the treatment is more effective in a subpopulation, these adaptive designs can improve study power substantially. Furthermore, we identified one adaptive design to have generally higher study power than the other designs under various scenarios. © 2017, International Chinese Statistical Association.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 404
页数:33
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Adaptive Biomarker Population Selection in Phase III Confirmatory Trials with Time-to-Event Endpoints
    Li X.
    Chen C.
    Li W.
    [J]. Statistics in Biosciences, 2018, 10 (2) : 324 - 341
  • [2] Confirmatory adaptive group sequential designs for single-arm phase II studies with multiple time-to-event endpoints
    Danzer, Moritz Fabian
    Terzer, Tobias
    Berthold, Frank
    Faldum, Andreas
    Schmidt, Rene
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 64 (02) : 312 - 342
  • [3] A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints
    Di Stefano, Fulvio
    Pannaux, Matthieu
    Correges, Anne
    Galtier, Stephanie
    Robert, Veronique
    Saint-Hilary, Gaelle
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (10) : 1767 - 1779
  • [4] Group sequential adaptive designs in series of time-to-event randomised trials in rare diseases: A simulation study
    Bayar, Mohamed Amine
    Le Teuff, Gwenael
    Koenig, Franz
    Le Deley, Marie-Cecile
    Michiels, Stefan
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (06) : 1483 - 1498
  • [5] Optimizing trial design in pharmacogenetics research: comparing a fixed parallel group, group sequential, and adaptive selection design on sample size requirements
    Boessen, Ruud
    van der Baan, Frederieke
    Groenwold, Rolf
    Egberts, Antoine
    Klungel, Olaf
    Grobbee, Diederick
    Knol, Mirjam
    Roes, Kit
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2013, 12 (06) : 366 - 374
  • [6] Point and interval estimation in two-stage adaptive designs with time to event data and biomarker-driven subpopulation selection
    Kimani, Peter K.
    Todd, Susan
    Renfro, Lindsay A.
    Glimm, Ekkehard
    Khan, Josephine N.
    Kairalla, John A.
    Stallard, Nigel
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (19) : 2568 - 2586
  • [7] A Bayesian adaptive phase III design for multi-arm trials with time-to-event endpoint for nonproportional hazards utilizing the generalized gamma distribution
    Thewarapperuma, Nadeesha
    Phadnis, Milind A.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2024,
  • [8] Simultaneous population enrichment and endpoint selection in phase 3 randomized controlled trials: An adaptive group sequential design with two binary alternative primary endpoints
    Sinha, Arup K.
    Moye III, Lemuel
    Piller, Linda B.
    Yamal, Jose-Miguel
    Barcenas, Carlos H.
    Song, Jaejoon
    Davis, Barry R.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2024, 53 (10) : 3728 - 3741
  • [9] 2 stage subgroup-specific time-to-event (2S-Sub-TITE): An adaptive two-stage time-to-toxicity design for subgroup-specific dose finding in phase I oncology trials
    McGovern, Alana
    Chapple, Andrew G.
    Ma, Clement
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 21 (06) : 1138 - 1148