Arsenate and Arsenite Sorption on Magnetite: Relations to Groundwater Arsenic Treatment Using Zerovalent Iron and Natural Attenuation

被引:0
|
作者
Chunming Su
Robert W. Puls
机构
[1] United States Environmental Protection Agency,Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development
来源
关键词
Arsenate and arsenite sorption; Magnetite; Zerovalent iron; Permeable reactive barriers; Natural attenuation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Magnetite (Fe3O4) is a zerovalent iron corrosion product; it is also formed in natural soil and sediment. Sorption of arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) on magnetite is an important process of arsenic removal from groundwater using zerovalent iron-based permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technology and natural attenuation. We tested eight magnetite samples (one from Phoenix Environmental Ltd, one from Cerac, Inc. and six from Connelly-GPM, Inc.) that contained from 79 to 100% magnetite. The magnetites were reacted in the absence of light with either As(V) or As(III) in 0.01 M NaCl at 23°C at equilibrium pH 2.5–11.5 for 24 h. As(V) sorption showed a continuous drop with increasing pH from 2.5 to 11.5; whereas, As(III) sorption exhibited maxima from pH 7 to 9. Equal amounts of As(V) and As(III) were sorbed at pH 5.6–6.8. Higher amounts of As(III) were sorbed by the magnetites than As(V) at pH values greater than 6.8. The solution speciation test did not show any chemical reduction of As(V) in any magnetite suspension, which is consistent with the X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) study of a Connelly-GPM magnetite (CC-1048) suspension. Conversely, XPS results show that the As(III) is partially oxidized in the magnetite (CC-1048) suspension. This is also consistent with the batch test results that also show more oxidation occurring at alkaline pH. Complete oxidation of As(III) occurred in a synthetic birnessite (δ-MnO2) suspension after 24 h of reaction. The minute impurities of Mn (possibly as an oxide form) in the magnetite samples may have been responsible for As(III) oxidation. In addition, the structural Fe(III) in magnetite and hydroxyl radicals in solution could also serve as oxidants for As(III) oxidation. The conversion of As(III) to As(V) in the magnetite suspensions would be beneficial in a remediation scheme for As removal, since As(V) is considered less toxic than As(III). Information from the present study can help predict the sorption behavior and fate of arsenic species in engineered PRB systems and natural environments.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 78
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Arsenate and arsenite sorption on magnetite: Relations to groundwater arsenic treatment using zerovalent iron and natural attenuation
    Su, Chunming
    Puls, Robert W.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2008, 193 (1-4): : 65 - 78
  • [2] Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: Kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation
    Su, CM
    Puls, RW
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (07) : 1487 - 1492
  • [3] Arsenate and Arsenite Sorption Using Biogenic Iron Compounds: Treatment of Real Polluted Waters in Batch and Continuous Systems
    Castro, Laura
    Ayala, Lesly Antonieta
    Vardanyan, Arevik
    Zhang, Ruiyong
    Angel Munoz, Jesus
    [J]. METALS, 2021, 11 (10)
  • [4] Arsenite and arsenate removals from groundwater by electrocoagulation using iron ball anodes: Influence of operating parameters
    Sik, E.
    Demirbas, E.
    Goren, A. Y.
    Oncel, M. S.
    Kobya, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2017, 18 : 83 - 91
  • [5] Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies
    Wilkin, Richard T.
    Acree, Steven D.
    Ross, Randall R.
    Beak, Douglas G.
    Lee, Tony R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2009, 106 (1-2) : 1 - 14
  • [6] Treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater using iron filings: Field experiments
    Nikolaidis, NP
    [J]. PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT VI, VOLS I - III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 27 - 34
  • [7] In situ remediation of arsenic in simulated groundwater using zerovalent iron: Laboratory column tests on combined effects of phosphate and silicate
    Su, CM
    Puls, RW
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (11) : 2582 - 2587
  • [8] Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies
    Beak, Douglas G.
    Wilkin, Richard T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2009, 106 (1-2) : 15 - 28
  • [9] Concurrent elimination of arsenic and hydrated silica from natural groundwater by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes
    Valentin-Reyes, Jonathan
    Coreno, Oscar
    Nava, Jose L.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 184 : 103 - 112
  • [10] The influence of thermal treatment on bioweathering and arsenic sorption capacity of a natural iron (oxyhydr)oxide-based adsorbent
    Debiec, Klaudia
    Rzepa, Grzegorz
    Bajda, Tomasz
    Zych, Lukasz
    Krzysztoforski, Jan
    Sklodowska, Aleksandra
    Drewniak, Lukasz
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 188 : 99 - 109