Current legal status of advance directives in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Ben A. Rich
机构
[1] University of California,Davis School of Medicine
来源
关键词
Advance directive; informed consent; individual autonomy; substituted judgment; personal identity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advance directive legislation has been in place throughout much of the United States for nearly 3 decades. The right to give an informed consent to or refusal of medical treatment has been recognized by state and federal courts, and that right has been determined to survive the loss of decisional capacity and may be exercised through the execution of instructional or proxy directives. Despite these developments. the percentage of the adult population with a formal advance directive of any type has never exceeded 15%. Moreover, a remarkable number of these directives are ambiguous and/or their existence is unknown to the physicians who are expected to rely upon them. Even unambiguous directives may not be followed at the critical stage in the trajectory of a patient’s illness, and the accountability for such disregard by health care institutions or professionals is negligible to nonexistent. Nevertheless, there is real potential for advance directives, as a key element to sound advance care planning, to fulfill their initial promise as instruments of the prospective autonomy of patients. In order for that potential to be realized, primary care physicians must embrace advance care planning as a part of their professional responsibility to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 426
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current legal status of advance directives in the United States
    Rich, BA
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2004, 116 (13) : 420 - 426
  • [2] ADVANCE DIRECTIVES - THE UNITED-STATES EXPERIENCE
    CRANFORD, RE
    [J]. HUMANE MEDICINE, 1993, 9 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [3] From advance directives to advance care planning: current legal status, ethical rationales and a new research agenda
    Jordens, C
    Little, M
    Kerridge, I
    McPhee, J
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 35 (09) : 563 - 566
  • [4] Advance directives need full legal status in persons with dementia
    Hart, Dean Evan
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2024,
  • [5] Application of United States advance directives on Italian soil
    Kinney, ML
    Turpin, LA
    Marino, MG
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 1997, 162 (08) : 571 - 572
  • [6] Prevalence Of Advance Directives In The United States: A Systematic Review
    Yadav, K. N.
    Gabler, N.
    Cooney, E.
    Kent, S.
    Kim, J.
    Herbst, N.
    Mante, A.
    Halpern, S. D.
    Courtright, K. R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [7] Advance directives and withdrawal of dialysis in the United States, Germany, and Japan
    Sehgal, AR
    Weisheit, C
    Miura, Y
    Butzlaff, M
    Kielstein, R
    Taguchi, Y
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (20): : 1652 - 1656
  • [8] Current legal status of medical marijuana and cannabidiol in the United States
    Alharbi, Yousef N.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 112
  • [9] Issues in applying advance directives to psychiatric care in the United States
    Srebnik, Debra
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2005, 24 : S42 - S45
  • [10] Advance Directives and Frailty Status
    Robles-Torres, A. A.
    Priyadarshni, S.
    Mintzer, M. J.
    Dang, S.
    Valencia, W. M.
    Ruiz, J. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2018, 66 : S236 - S236