Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for the management of pain in labour and childbirth [ISRCTN52287533]

被引:16
|
作者
Roberts C.L. [1 ]
Raynes-Greenow C.H. [1 ]
Nassar N. [1 ]
Trevena L. [2 ]
McCaffery K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr. for Perinatal Health Serv. Res., University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006
[2] School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Pain Relief; Epidural Analgesia; Decisional Conflict; Primiparous Woman; Labour Analgesia;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-4-24
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Women report fear of pain in childbirth and often lack complete information on analgesic options prior to labour. Preferences for pain relief should be discussed before labour begins. A woman's antepartum decision to use pain relief is likely influenced by her cultural background, friends, family, the media, literature and her antenatal caregivers. Pregnant women report that information about analgesia was most commonly derived from hearsay and least commonly from health professionals. Decision aids are emerging as a promising tool to assist practitioners and their patients in evidence-based decision making. Decision aids are designed to assist patients and their doctors in making informed decisions using information that is unbiased and based on high quality research evidence. Decision aids are non-directive in the sense that they do not aim to steer the user towards any one option, but rather to support decision making which is informed and consistent with personal values. Methods/design: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a Pain Relief for Labour decision aid, with and without an audio-component, compared to a pamphlet in a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Approximately 600 women expecting their first baby and planning a vaginal birth will be recruited for the trial. The primary outcomes of the study are decisional conflict (uncertainty about a course of action), knowledge, anxiety and satisfaction with decision-making and will be assessed using self-administered questionnaires. The decision aid is not intended to influence the type of analgesia used during labour, however we will monitor health service utilisation rates and maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study is funded by a competitive peer-reviewed grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (No. 253635). Discussion: The Pain Relief for Labour decision aid was developed using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and systematic reviews of the evidence about the benefits and risks of the non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods of pain relief for labour. It comprises a workbook and worksheet and has been developed in two forms - with and without an audio-component (compact disc). The format allows women to take the decision aid home and discuss it with their partner. © 2004 Roberts et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN14570598]
    Nassar, N.
    Roberts, C. L.
    Raynes-Greenow, C. H.
    Barratt, A.
    Peat, B.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (03) : 325 - 333
  • [2] Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
    Camille H Raynes-Greenow
    Natasha Nassar
    Siranda Torvaldsen
    Lyndal Trevena
    Christine L Roberts
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10
  • [3] Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet
    Raynes-Greenow, Camille H.
    Nassar, Natasha
    Torvaldsen, Siranda
    Trevena, Lyndal
    Roberts, Christine L.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2010, 10
  • [4] Admitting women in active labour: A randomised controlled trial about the effects of protocol use on childbirth method and interventions
    Kasegari, Freshteh Abasian
    Pazandeh, Farzaneh
    Darvish, Soodabeh
    Huss, Reinhard
    Nasiri, Malihe
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2020, 33 (06) : E543 - E548
  • [5] Effectiveness of a childbirth massage programme for labour pain relief in nulliparous pregnant women at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Lai, C. Y.
    Wong, Margaret K. W.
    Tong, W. H.
    Chu, S. Y.
    Lau, K. Y.
    Tam, Agnes M. L.
    Hui, L. L.
    Lao, Terence T. H.
    Leung, T. Y.
    [J]. HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (06) : 405 - 412
  • [6] A randomised controlled trial of a patient based Diabetes recall and Management system: the DREAM trial: A study protocol [ISRCTN32042030]
    Martin Eccles
    Gillian Hawthorne
    Paula Whitty
    Nick Steen
    Alessandra Vanoli
    Jeremy Grimshaw
    Linda Wood
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2
  • [7] Correction: Sterile water injections for relief of labour pain (the SATURN trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Nigel Lee
    Yu Gao
    Lena B. Mårtensson
    Leonie Callaway
    Belinda Barnett
    Sue Kildea
    [J]. Trials, 23
  • [8] A randomised controlled trial of a patient based Diabetes recall and Management system: the DREAM trial: A study protocol [ISRCTN32042030]
    Eccles, M
    Hawthorne, G
    Whitty, P
    Steen, N
    Vanoli, A
    Grimshaw, J
    Wood, L
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 2 (1) : 5
  • [9] Complementary therapies for labour and birth study: a randomised controlled trial of antenatal integrative medicine for pain management in labour
    Levett, Kate M.
    Smith, C. A.
    Bensoussan, A.
    Dahlen, H. G.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07):
  • [10] Study protocol Protocol for the MoleMate™ UK Trial: a randomised controlled trial of the MoleMate system in the management of pigmented skin lesions in primary care [ISRCTN 79932379]
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Morris, Helen C.
    Humphrys, Elka
    Hall, Per N.
    Kinmonth, Ann Louise
    Prevost, A. Toby
    Wilson, Edward C. F.
    Burrows, Nigel
    Norris, Paul
    Johnson, Margaret
    Emery, Jon
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 11