Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review

被引：0
|
作者：
Hans Lund
Karen A. Robinson
Ane Gjerland
Hanna Nykvist
Thea Marie Drachen
Robin Christensen
Carsten Bogh Juhl
Gro Jamtvedt
Monica Nortvedt
Merete Bjerrum
Matt Westmore
Jennifer Yost
Klara Brunnhuber
机构：
[1] Western Norway University of Applied Sciences,Section Evidence
[2] Johns Hopkins University,Based Practice, Department for Health and Function
[3] University Library of Southern Denmark,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine
[4] Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital,Research and Analysis Department
[5] Odense University Hospital,Section for Biostatistics and Evidence
[6] University of Southern Denmark,Based Research, the Parker Institute
[7] Herlev and Gentofte Hospital,Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark
[8] Faculty of Health Sciences,Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics
[9] OsloMet,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy
[10] Western Norway University of Applied Sciences,Faculty of Health and Social Science
[11] Aarhus University,Research Unit of Nursing and healthcare, Institute of Public Health, Health
[12] Aalborg University,The Centre of Clinical Guidelines, Department of Clinical Medicine
[13] The University of Adelaide,The Danish Centre of Systematic Reviews
[14] Health Research Authority, A JBI Centre of Excellence
[15] NHS,M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing
[16] Villanova University,undefined
[17] Clinical Solutions,undefined
[18] Elsevier Ltd.,undefined
来源：
Systematic Reviews | / 11卷
关键词：
Evidence-based research; Scoping review; Meta-research; Research on research; Systematicity; Transparency;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review
    Lund, Hans
    Robinson, Karen A.
    Gjerland, Ane
    Nykvist, Hanna
    Drachen, Thea Marie
    Christensen, Robin
    Juhl, Carsten Bogh
    Jamtvedt, Gro
    Nortvedt, Monica
    Bjerrum, Merete
    Westmore, Matt
    Yost, Jennifer
    Brunnhuber, Klara
    Network, Evidence-Based Research
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [2] Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
    Eva Draborg
    Jane Andreasen
    Birgitte Nørgaard
    Carsten Bogh Juhl
    Jennifer Yost
    Klara Brunnhuber
    Karen A. Robinson
    Hans Lund
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [3] Overadjustment bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of socio-economic inequalities in health: a meta-research scoping review
    van Zwieten, Anita
    Dai, Jiahui
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Wong, Germaine
    Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (01)
  • [4] Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science-A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
    Andreasen, Jane
    Norgaard, Birgitte
    Draborg, Eva
    Juhl, Carsten Bogh
    Yost, Jennifer
    Brunnhuber, Klara
    Robinson, Karen A.
    Lund, Hans
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [5] Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research
    Sofi-Mahmudi, Ahmad
    Iranparvar, Pouria
    Shakiba, Maryam
    Shamsoddin, Erfan
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Naseri, Sadaf
    Motie, Parisa
    Tovani-Palone, Marcos Roberto
    Mesgarpour, Bita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [6] Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results-a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
    Draborg, Eva
    Andreasen, Jane
    Norgaard, Birgitte
    Juhl, Carsten Bogh
    Yost, Jennifer
    Brunnhuber, Klara
    Robinson, Karen A.
    Lund, Hans
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [7] Defining and Evaluating Overdiagnosis in Mental Health: A Meta-Research Review
    Thombs, Brett
    Turner, Kimberly A.
    Shrier, Ian
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2019, 88 (04) : 193 - 202
  • [8] Reporting quality of scoping reviews in endodontics: A meta-research study
    Tzanetakis, Giorgos N.
    Petridis, Xenos
    Jakovljevic, Aleksandar
    Koletsi, Despina
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Duncan, Henry F.
    Dummer, Paul M. H.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2024, 57 (12) : 1717 - 1726
  • [9] Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study
    Sargeant, Jan M.
    Reynolds, Kristen
    Winder, Charlotte B.
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 195
  • [10] The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals
    Rosen, Diane
    Reiter, Nils L.
    Vogel, Barbara
    Prill, Robert
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
12345