Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

被引:2
|
作者
Tsao, Henry [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Trembath, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Jones, Philip [4 ]
Snelling, Peter J. [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Redland Hosp, Emergency Dept, Cleveland, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Herston, Qld, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Southport, Qld, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Southport, Qld, Australia
[6] Sonog Innovat & Res Grp, Sonar Grp, Southport, Qld, Australia
关键词
Supraclavicular block; Nerve block; Bier block; Regional anaesthesia; Emergency medicine; Randomised controlled trial; Ultrasonography; Upper limb injury; Pain; FRACTURE REDUCTION; SEDATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07403-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundClosed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations are common in the emergency department (ED), which involves physically re-aligning the injured part prior to immobilisation. As this is painful, numerous techniques are available to provide regional anaesthesia to ensure patient tolerance. A Bier block (BB) is typically performed as part of routine care. An alternative technique gaining interest in the ED is ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB), which involves injecting local anaesthetic around the brachial plexus at the supraclavicular fossa under ultrasound guidance. It is unclear whether UGSCB is effective and safe when performed in the ED.MethodsSUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with an upper limb fracture and/or dislocation that requires emergent closed reduction in the ED will be eligible. After screening, participants will be randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part will be performed and appropriately immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include baseline and post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.DiscussionExisting evidence suggests UGSCB is effective when performed in the operating theatre by trained anaesthetists. SUPERB will be the first randomised controlled trial to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The findings have the potential to provide an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: statistical analysis plan
    Jones, Philip
    Tsao, Henry
    Snelling, Peter
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [2] Bedside Ultrasound Conducted in Kids with distal upper Limb fractures in the Emergency Department (BUCKLED): a protocol for an open-label non-inferiority diagnostic randomised controlled trial
    Peter J. Snelling
    Gerben Keijzers
    Joshua Byrnes
    David Bade
    Shane George
    Mark Moore
    Philip Jones
    Michelle Davison
    Rob Roan
    Robert S. Ware
    Trials, 22
  • [3] Bedside Ultrasound Conducted in Kids with distal upper Limb fractures in the Emergency Department (BUCKLED): a protocol for an open-label non-inferiority diagnostic randomised controlled trial
    Snelling, Peter J.
    Keijzers, Gerben
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Bade, David
    George, Shane
    Moore, Mark
    Jones, Philip
    Davison, Michelle
    Roan, Rob
    Ware, Robert S.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [4] Intertruncal versus classical approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial
    Quehua Luo
    Yujing Cai
    Hanbin Xie
    Guoliang Sun
    Jianqiang Guan
    Yi Zhu
    Weifeng Yao
    Haihua Shu
    Trials, 23
  • [5] Intertruncal versus classical approach to the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial
    Luo, Quehua
    Cai, Yujing
    Xie, Hanbin
    Sun, Guoliang
    Guan, Jianqiang
    Zhu, Yi
    Yao, Weifeng
    Shu, Haihua
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [6] Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for ultrasound-guided right subclavian venous catheterisation: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Kim, Y. J.
    Ma, S.
    Yoon, H. K.
    Lee, H. C.
    Park, H. P.
    Oh, H.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [7] Comparison of ultrasound-guided subtransverse process interligamentary plane block with paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery: protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Wu, Wei
    Wang, Danyang
    Liu, Yang
    Zhu, Tianyi
    He, Wenxin
    Shi, Hong
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [8] Levobupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine versus Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine for Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Batool, Sofia
    Rai, Ram Bahadur
    Yougyal, Tsering
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2025, 19 (03) : UC26 - UC31
  • [9] A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
    Irene Sulyok
    Claudio Camponovo
    Oliver Zotti
    Werner Haslik
    Markus Köstenberger
    Rudolf Likar
    Chiara Leuratti
    Elisabetta Donati
    Oliver Kimberger
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [10] A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
    Sulyok, Irene
    Camponovo, Claudio
    Zotti, Oliver
    Haslik, Werner
    Kostenberger, Markus
    Likar, Rudolf
    Leuratti, Chiara
    Donati, Elisabetta
    Kimberger, Oliver
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)