A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research

被引:0
|
作者
James A. Cunningham
Matthias Menter
Chris Young
机构
[1] Northumbria University,Newcastle Business School
[2] University of Augsburg,Faculty of Business and Economics
[3] National University of Ireland Galway,Whitaker Institute
来源
关键词
Technology transfer; Case method; Case study; Qualitative; Research methods; Data collection; Cases; Commercialization; Academic entrepreneurship; C42; O31; O32; O33; O34; L6; L7; L8; L9;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The focus of this paper is to review the qualitative case methods that have been used in technology transfer research over the last 20 years from 1996 to 2015. Case methods allow for more in-depth analyses and provide the opportunity to place research into a certain context due to the selection of e.g. specific sectors, institutions, countries, etc. Using a systematic literature review of five of the top journals in the field of technology transfer research, namely Journal of Technology Transfer, Research Policy, Science and Public Policy, R&D Management and Technovation, it yielded 107 articles using the search terms: “Technology Transfer” AND (“Case Study” OR “Case Method” OR “Qualitative”). Our findings indicate a clustering of themes using qualitative case methods around technology transfer mechanisms and TTOs, academic entrepreneurship, university-industry collaboration, commercialization as well as R&D and firm knowledge transfer. We also identify trends in case method technology transfer research with respect to authorship, location of papers, sectoral contexts, data collection, numbers of cases and data analysis software. We conclude our paper discussing the implications of trends and themes and suggest that researchers need to reflect on used terminology and their utilization and postulate a need for more plurality of data collection methods.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:923 / 956
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research
    Cunningham, James A.
    Menter, Matthias
    Young, Chris
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2017, 42 (04): : 923 - 956
  • [2] A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research Methods Used With People in Prison
    Abbott, Penelope
    DiGiacomo, Michelle
    Magin, Parker
    Hu, Wendy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2018, 17 (01):
  • [3] Qualitative Research Methods and Epistemological Frameworks: A Review of Publication Trends in Entrepreneurship
    Hlady-Rispal, Martine
    Jouison-Laffitte, Estele
    JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 52 (04) : 594 - 614
  • [4] Qualitative methods research in information systems: motivations, themes, and contributions
    Conboy, Kieran
    Fitzgerald, Guy
    Mathiassen, Lars
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [5] How are qualitative methods used in implementation science research? A scoping review protocol
    Hagaman, Ashley
    Rhodes, Elizabeth C.
    Nyhan, Kate
    Katague, Marina
    Schwartz, Anna
    Spiegelman, Donna
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (06) : 1344 - 1353
  • [6] Themes, Trends, and Knowledge Structure in 30 Years of Starch Research in Food Science and Technology: a Visualization Review
    Wang, Xu
    Hong, Yan
    Gu, Zhengbiao
    Cheng, Li
    Li, Zhaofeng
    Li, Caiming
    Ban, Xiaofeng
    STARCH-STARKE, 2022, 74 (5-6):
  • [7] How are qualitative methods used in diabetes research? A 30-year systematic review
    Hennink, Monique M.
    Kaiser, Bonnie N.
    Sekar, Swathi
    Griswold, Emily P.
    Ali, Mohammed K.
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 12 (02) : 200 - 219
  • [8] REVIEW OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS IN NURSING
    LEININGER, M
    NURSING RESEARCH, 1987, 36 (02) : 116 - 116
  • [9] Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology
    Gorman, G. E.
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2015, 39 (04) : 590 - 591
  • [10] Technology transfer: Trends in the federalization of biomedical research
    Bulleit, TN
    Bonnet, SM
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (07) : 709 - 715