How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare?

被引:10
|
作者
Rotar-Pavlič D. [1 ]
Švab I. [1 ]
Wetzels R. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Ljubljana, Medical Faculty, Department of Family Medicine, 1000 Ljubljana
[2] Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
关键词
Ethical Dilemma; Patient Involvement; Patient Autonomy; Trivial Issue; Empirical Practice;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2318-8-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Older persons represent a growing share of the population, yet very little is known about their specific healthcare needs, problems, and expectations. IMPROVE is an international research project that seeks to improve elderly persons' involvement in their healthcare. This paper analyzes perceptions of patient involvement by elderly patients and their GPs in family medicine in Slovenia. Methods. Semi-structured interviews with patients over 70 and their GPs were audio-taped and transcribed. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results. Specific characteristics of old age must be taken into account in the involvement of older patients. It is important to know the patient's expectations and to communicate clearly with the patient. A trusting relationship between the GP and the patient is a prerequisite for involvement. GPs center involvement on the GP's side. Involvement of the elderly is linked to ethical dilemmas. Conclusion. Understanding the involvement of the elderly focuses more on building a relationship than on making decisions. It is reasonable to educate GPs and GPs' coworkers about caring relationships. Ethical aspects have often been treated in a theoretical manner, whereas empirical practice may be entirely different from theoretical premises. GPs and older patients must learn more about how to address their ethical dilemmas. © 2008 Rotar-Pavlič et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HOW DO YOU MEASURE SHARED DECISION-MAKING
    RUSSELL, JJ
    COOPER, BS
    GREENBLATT, RB
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1992, 50 (01) : 39 - 40
  • [2] Older patients and their GPs: shared decision making in enhancing trust
    Butterworth, Joanne E.
    Campbell, John L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (628): : E709 - E718
  • [3] The Internet and shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers
    Silber, Denise
    [J]. PRESSE MEDICALE, 2009, 38 (10): : 1491 - 1493
  • [4] Shared decision-making - Why and how to?
    Pieterse, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S841 - S842
  • [5] Shared decision-making tools: do they really involve patients?
    Walsh, Kieran
    Sandars, John
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (06) : 304 - 305
  • [6] Do Patients Want Shared Decision Making and How Is This Measured?
    Haerter, Martin
    Simon, Daniela
    [J]. BETTER DOCTORS, BETTER PATIENTS, BETTER DECISIONS: ENVISIONING HEALTH CARE 2020, 2011, : 53 - 58
  • [7] Value-Based Healthcare, PROMs and Shared Decision-Making - How Are They Connected?
    Rueter, Florian
    Meier, Christoph A.
    [J]. THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU, 2022, 79 (08) : 359 - 363
  • [8] Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology
    Sandra van Dulmen
    Ruud Roodbeen
    Lotte Schulze
    Karen Prantl
    Maarten Rookmaaker
    Brigit van Jaarsveld
    Janneke Noordman
    Alferso Abrahams
    [J]. BMC Nephrology, 23
  • [9] Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology
    van Dulmen, Sandra
    Roodbeen, Ruud
    Schulze, Lotte
    Prantl, Karen
    Rookmaaker, Maarten
    van Jaarsveld, Brigit
    Noordman, Janneke
    Abrahams, Alferso
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [10] Shared decision-making in cardiology: Do patients want it and do doctors provide it?
    Burton, David
    Blundell, Nicholas
    Jones, Mari
    Fraser, Alan
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 80 (02) : 173 - 179