Comparison and explanation of data-driven modeling for weld quality prediction in resistance spot welding

被引:2
|
作者
Russell, Matthew [1 ]
Kershaw, Joseph [2 ]
Xia, Yujun [3 ]
Lv, Tianle [3 ]
Li, Yongbing [3 ]
Ghassemi-Armaki, Hassan [4 ]
Carlson, Blair E. [4 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Lexington, KY USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Gen Motors, Global Res & Dev, Warren, MI USA
关键词
Resistance spot welding; Neural networks; Quality prediction; Process monitoring; DISPLACEMENT; COMBINATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10845-023-02108-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Resistance spot welding (RSW) is an important manufacturing process across major industries due to its high production speed and ease of automation. Though conceptually straightforward, the process combines complex electrical, thermal, fluidic, and mechanical phenomena to permanently assemble sheet metal components. These complex process dynamics make RSW prone to inconsistencies, even with modern automation techniques. This motivates online process monitoring and quality evaluation systems for quality assurance. This study investigates in-situ process sensing and neural networks-based modeling to understand key aspects of RSW process monitoring and offers three contributions: (1) a comparison of two data-driven modeling approaches, a feature-based Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and a raw sensing-based convolutional neural network (CNN), (2) a comparison of how electrical and mechanical sensing data affect the model's performance, and (3) an explanation of MLP behavior using Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values to interpret the contribution of sensing features to weld quality metric predictions. Both the MLP and CNN can predict weld quality metrics (e.g., nugget geometry) and detect a process defect (i.e., expulsion) using in-situ current and resistance sensing signals. Including force and displacement measurements improved performance, and the SHAP values revealed salient features underlying the RSW process (e.g., displacement contributes significantly to predicting axial nugget growth). Future work will explore additional architectural developments, explore ways to translate lab-developed models to production plants, and leverage these models to optimize RSW processes and improve quality consistency.
引用
收藏
页码:1305 / 1319
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data-Driven Framework for Electrode Wear Prediction in Resistance Spot Welding
    Panza, Luigi
    Bruno, Giulia
    De Maddis, Manuela
    Lombardi, Franco
    Spena, Pasquale Russo
    Traini, Emiliano
    [J]. PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT: GREEN AND BLUE TECHNOLOGIES TO SUPPORT SMART AND SUSTAINABLE ORGANIZATIONS, PT I, 2022, 639 : 239 - 252
  • [2] Thermal Modeling of Resistance Spot Welding and Prediction of Weld Microstructure
    Sheikhi, M.
    Tale, M. Valaee
    Usefifar, GH. R.
    Fattah-Alhosseini, Arash
    [J]. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 48A (11): : 5415 - 5423
  • [3] Thermal Modeling of Resistance Spot Welding and Prediction of Weld Microstructure
    M. Sheikhi
    M. Valaee Tale
    GH. R. Usefifar
    Arash Fattah-Alhosseini
    [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2017, 48 : 5415 - 5423
  • [4] A comparison of two types of neural network for weld quality prediction in small scale resistance spot welding
    Wan, Xiaodong
    Wang, Yuanxun
    Zhao, Dawei
    Huang, YongAn
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 93 : 634 - 644
  • [5] Online prediction of resistance spot weld quality and model explanation under fluctuating conditions
    Lv, Tianle
    Qi, Miaomiao
    Yan, Dejun
    Li, Shuhua
    Xia, Yujun
    Li, Yongbing
    [J]. Hanjie Xuebao/Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2022, 43 (11): : 91 - 100
  • [6] Implementation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Weld Quality Prediction and Optimization in Resistance Spot Welding
    Johnson, Nevan Nicholas
    Madhavadas, Vaishnav
    Asati, Brajesh
    Giri, Anoj
    Hanumant, Shinde Ajit
    Shajan, Nikhil
    Arora, Kanwer Singh
    Selvaraj, Senthil Kumaran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 33 (13) : 6561 - 6585
  • [7] Quality monitoring of spot welding with advanced signal processing and data-driven techniques
    Wang, Xing-Jue
    Zhou, Jun-Hong
    Yan, Heng-Chao
    Pang, Chee Khiang
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2018, 40 (07) : 2291 - 2302
  • [8] An Ensemble Data-Driven Fuzzy Network for Laser Welding Quality Prediction
    Rubio-Solis, Adrian
    Panoutsos, George
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2017,
  • [9] Prediction Modeling Framework With Bootstrap Aggregating for Noisy Resistance Spot Welding Data
    Park, Junheung
    Kim, Kyoung-Yun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2017, 139 (10):
  • [10] A comparison of resistance spot weld quality assessment techniques
    Summerville, Cameron
    Compston, Paul
    Doolan, Matthew
    [J]. 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SHEET METAL, SHEMET 2019 - NEW TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN SHEET METAL PROCESSING, 2019, 29 : 305 - 312