Using the “Indicators of Engaged Learning Online” Framework to Evaluate Online Course Quality

被引:18
|
作者
Bigatel P.M. [1 ]
Edel-Malizia S. [2 ]
机构
[1] World Campus, Faculty Development, Penn State University, 223 Outreach Bldg., University Park, 16802, PA
[2] Education Technology Services, Penn State University, 003A Shields Bldg., University Park, 16802, PA
关键词
Instructional design; Online learning; Quality online instruction; Student engagement;
D O I
10.1007/s11528-017-0239-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article is a case study of the use of the Indicators of Engaged Learning Online (IELO) framework (See Appendix 1) as a guide to evaluate the quality of online courses. The framework lends itself well to measures of engagement, particularly, in terms of online course design because of its comprehensiveness. Six online courses were evaluated for quality in terms of engaged learning based on thirty indicators contained within the framework. Results ranged from a score of 21 to 71 out of a potential total score of 90. This 0–90 scale represented a continuum of passive to engaged learning. The purpose of the pilot study was to explore how the Indicators of Engaged Learning Online (IELO) framework could be used as a tool for evaluating the quality of online courses by instructional designers (IDs) and instructors. Insights into the practical use of the IELO framework and the need for improved guidelines for IDs and instructors as they assess the amount of student engagement designed in a course are provided. Recommendations for practice have implications for both aspects of engagement: how a course is designed and how it is delivered. © 2017, Association for Educational Communications & Technology.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 70
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality Course Development for Online Learning
    DeAntonio, Michael
    Johnson, Sandra R.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2014,
  • [2] QUALITY INDICATORS PROPOSAL FOR A MASSIVE OPEN ONLINE COURSE (MOOC)
    Aleman de la Garza, Lorena
    [J]. ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 5317 - 5327
  • [3] Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning
    You, Ji Won
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 29 : 23 - 30
  • [4] Using Online Discussions in a Blended Learning Course
    Holenko, Martina
    Hoic-Bozic, Natasa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2008, 3 : 18 - 23
  • [5] ONLINE LEARNING: USING A SPACE METAPHOR TO EVALUATE DESIGN AND LEARNING
    Sharma, Priya
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2017), 2017, : 8689 - 8692
  • [6] Quality Indicators and Models for Online Learning Quality Assurance in Higher Education
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Naureen, Shazia
    Sultan, Sohaib
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING, 2022, 20 (04): : 374 - 385
  • [7] Quality Indicators of Online Programs
    Hirner, Leo
    Kochtanek, Thomas
    [J]. COMMUNITY COLLEGE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 36 (02) : 122 - 130
  • [8] Effects of Using World Indicators for Online ESD Learning
    Yoshida, Masami
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [9] Online Course with Use of Free Online Learning Materials
    Burgi, Rudolf
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC 2016), 2016, 24 : 79 - 83
  • [10] Online Blended Learning in Small Private Online Course
    Han, Yong
    Wu, Wenjun
    Zhang, Lijun
    Liang, Yu
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (15):