Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium

被引:0
|
作者
Alison Kretser
Delia Murphy
Stefano Bertuzzi
Todd Abraham
David B. Allison
Kathryn J. Boor
Johanna Dwyer
Andrea Grantham
Linda J. Harris
Rachelle Hollander
Chavonda Jacobs-Young
Sarah Rovito
Dorothea Vafiadis
Catherine Woteki
Jessica Wyndham
Rickey Yada
机构
[1] ILSI North America,U.S. Department of Agriculture
[2] American Society for Microbiology,Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition
[3] Formerly of the ILSI Global Board of Trustees,undefined
[4] Indiana University School of Public Health,undefined
[5] Cornell University,undefined
[6] Tufts Medical Center,undefined
[7] Canadian Nutrition Society,undefined
[8] International Association for Food Protection,undefined
[9] University of California,undefined
[10] Formerly of The National Academies of Sciences,undefined
[11] Engineering,undefined
[12] and Medicine,undefined
[13] The National Academy of Engineering,undefined
[14] Center for Engineering Ethics and Society,undefined
[15] Agricultural Research Service,undefined
[16] Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities,undefined
[17] American Heart Association,undefined
[18] Iowa State University (Formerly of the U.S. Department of Agriculture,undefined
[19] Research,undefined
[20] Education,undefined
[21] and Economics),undefined
[22] American Association for the Advancement of Science,undefined
[23] University of British Columbia,undefined
[24] Kellan,undefined
[25] National Council on Aging,undefined
来源
关键词
Culture of integrity; Responsible conduct of research (RCR); Quality of research; Open science; Research misconduct; Detrimental research practices;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 355
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
    Kretser, Alison
    Murphy, Delia
    Bertuzzi, Stefano
    Abraham, Todd
    Allison, David B.
    Boor, Kathryn J.
    Dwyer, Johanna
    Grantham, Andrea
    Harris, Linda J.
    Hollander, Rachelle
    Jacobs-Young, Chavonda
    Rovito, Sarah
    Vafiadis, Dorothea
    Woteki, Catherine
    Wyndham, Jessica
    Yada, Rickey
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2019, 25 (02) : 327 - 355
  • [2] Ethics in Science: Conduct and Best Practices of the Researcher for Scientific Integrity
    Serralvo, Francisco Antonio
    [J]. REVISTA ADMINISTRACAO EM DIALOGO, 2021, 23 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [3] GRADUATE TEACHING IN PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
    MACRINA, FL
    MUNRO, CL
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1993, 68 (12) : 879 - 884
  • [4] Food industry shaping of the principles of scientific integrity
    Mialon, Melissa
    Ho, M.
    Carriedo, A.
    Ruskins, G.
    Crosbie, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31 : 319 - 319
  • [5] SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
    MUCKLE, TJ
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1993, 149 (07) : 923 - 923
  • [6] Scientific integrity
    Hogue, Cheryl
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2008, 86 (17) : 15 - 15
  • [7] SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY
    FEYNMAN, RPF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 1990, 35 (03) : 322 - 322
  • [8] Scientific integrity
    Chopra, KL
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (03): : 231 - 232
  • [9] Scientific integrity
    Vandervoort, FS
    [J]. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 1997, 59 (02): : 72 - 72
  • [10] Scientific integrity
    Gori, Gio B.
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 54 (03) : 213 - 213