Assessing Critical Source Areas in Watersheds for Conservation Buffer Planning and Riparian Restoration

被引:0
|
作者
Zeyuan Qiu
机构
[1] New Jersey Institute of Technology,Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science
来源
Environmental Management | 2009年 / 44卷
关键词
Conservation buffers; Variable area source hydrology; Geographic information systems; Hydrologically sensitive areas; Critical source areas; Topographic index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A science-based geographic information system (GIS) approach is presented to target critical source areas in watersheds for conservation buffer placement. Critical source areas are the intersection of hydrologically sensitive areas and pollutant source areas in watersheds. Hydrologically sensitive areas are areas that actively generate runoff in the watershed and are derived using a modified topographic index approach based on variable source area hydrology. Pollutant source areas are the areas in watersheds that are actively and intensively used for such activities as agricultural production. The method is applied to the Neshanic River watershed in Hunterdon County, New Jersey. The capacity of the topographic index in predicting the spatial pattern of runoff generation and the runoff contribution to stream flow in the watershed is evaluated. A simple cost-effectiveness assessment is conducted to compare the conservation buffer placement scenario based on this GIS method to conventional riparian buffer scenarios for placing conservation buffers in agricultural lands in the watershed. The results show that the topographic index reasonably predicts the runoff generation in the watershed. The GIS-based conservation buffer scenario appears to be more cost-effective than the conventional riparian buffer scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 980
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Assessing Critical Source Areas in Watersheds for Conservation Buffer Planning and Riparian Restoration
    Qiu, Zeyuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 44 (05) : 968 - 980
  • [2] Dynamic riparian buffer widths from potential non-point source pollution areas in forested watersheds
    Gorsevski, Pece V.
    Boll, Jan
    Gomezdelcampo, Enrique
    Brooks, Erin S.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 256 (04) : 664 - 673
  • [3] Vegetated Buffer Zone Restoration Planning in Small Urban Watersheds
    Duan, Yucong
    Tang, Jie
    Li, Zhaoyang
    Yang, Bo
    Yan, Yu
    Yang, Yao
    WATER, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [4] Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer zones in agricultural watersheds
    Mander, Ü
    Kuusemets, V
    Hayakawa, Y
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 24 (05) : 421 - 432
  • [5] A spatial multi-criteria planning scheme for evaluating riparian buffer restoration priorities
    Zhao, Peng
    Xia, Beicheng
    Hu, Yanfang
    Yang, Yajun
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 54 : 155 - 164
  • [6] Risk Indicators for Identifying Critical Source Areas in Five Arkansas Watersheds
    McCarty, J. A.
    Matlock, M. D.
    Scott, J. T.
    Haggard, B. E.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2018, 61 (03) : 1025 - 1032
  • [7] An Integrated Approach for Targeting Critical Source Areas to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution in Watersheds
    Subhasis Giri
    Zeyuan Qiu
    Tony Prato
    Biliang Luo
    Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 5087 - 5100
  • [8] An Integrated Approach for Targeting Critical Source Areas to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution in Watersheds
    Giri, Subhasis
    Qiu, Zeyuan
    Prato, Tony
    Luo, Biliang
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (14) : 5087 - 5100
  • [9] restauraRapp - An R package to subsidize forest restoration planning in Riparian Permanent Preservation Areas (PPAs)
    de Araujo, Julio Cesar Lima
    Martensen, Alexandre Camargo
    BIOTA NEOTROPICA, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [10] Macroinvertebrate communities in riverine systems of buffer areas of protected wildland, rangeland and city areas: implications for conservation of riverine systems on urbanising watersheds
    Nqobizitha Siziba
    Anele Matshisela
    Tongayi Mwedzi
    Taurai Bere
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 758 - 770