Differential Diagnosis of Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Stage I Malignant Ovarian Tumors using FDG PET/CT

被引:19
|
作者
Kim C. [1 ,5 ]
Chung H.H. [2 ]
Oh S.W. [1 ,3 ]
Kang K.W. [1 ]
Chung J.-K. [1 ]
Lee D.S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul
[3] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20 Boramae-Ro-5-Gil, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul
[4] Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, WCU Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul
[5] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan
关键词
Borderline ovarian tumor; FDG PET/CT; Metabolic tumor volume (MTV); Stage I malignant ovarian tumor; Standard uptake value (SUV);
D O I
10.1007/s13139-013-0197-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are more common in young women of reproductive age, and exhibit a better prognosis than malignant ovarian tumors (MOTs). Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were compared in their ability to differentiate BOTs from stage I MOTs. Methods: Among 173 patients who had preoperative FDG PET/CT due to ovarian neoplasms between November 2006 and March 2009, there were 13 patients with BOTs or stage I MOTs. For differential diagnosis of the two tumors, cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) level, the longest diameter of tumors, metabolic indices including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and volumetric indices including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were compared, respectively. Results: The BOT group (n = 7) was comprised of five mucinous and two serous tumors, and the MOT group (n = 6) was comprised of three endometrioid, two clear cell and one mucinous tumors. Among the comparisons between two groups, SUVmax of the BOT group was significantly lower than that of the MOT group (2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 6.6 ± 2.9, p = 0.0223); otherwise, no significant difference was found in age, CA-125, diameter, or MTV. By receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, SUVmax of 3.7 was the best cutoff value to differentiate BOTs from stage I MOTs, with a sensitivity of 83.3 % and specificity of 85.7, and the area under curve of 0.893 (p = 0.0001, 95 % CI: 0.601∼0.993). Conclusions: We demonstrated that SUVmax could distinguish BOTs from stage I MOTs, with a high sensitivity and specificity. Metabolic indices determined by FDG PET/CT were more suitable than volumetric indices for differential diagnosis of the two tumors. © 2013 Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usefulness of FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors from early stage malignant ovarian tumors
    Oh, So Won
    Kim, Chulhan
    Kang, Keon
    Lee, Myung Chul
    Chung, June-Key
    Lee, Dong Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [2] Computed Tomography Indicators for Differentiating Stage 1 Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Stage I Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors
    Moon, Min Hoan
    Park, Hee Sun
    Kim, Young Jun
    Yu, Mi Hye
    Park, Sungeun
    Jung, Sung Il
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [3] Multiparametric MRI for differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors from stage I malignant epithelial ovarian tumors using multivariate logistic regression analysis
    Denewar, Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Urano, Misugi
    Kamishima, Yuki
    Kawai, Tatsuya
    Takahashi, Naoki
    Takeuchi, Moe
    Kobayashi, Susumu
    Honda, Junichi
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 91 : 116 - 123
  • [4] Discordant MRI/FDG-PET imaging for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors
    Jung, D. C.
    Choi, H. J.
    Ju, W.
    Kim, S. C.
    Choi, K-G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (04) : 637 - 641
  • [5] Differential between ovarian tumor with solid portions and Stage I malignant ovarian cancer by FDG PET/CT
    Nakamoto, R.
    Nakamoto, Y.
    Ishimori, T.
    Kido, A.
    Togashi, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S722 - S722
  • [6] OVARIAN TUMORS OF LOW MALIGNANT POTENTIAL (BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS)
    Luchian, Alina-Mihaela
    Pricop, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2011, 115 (02): : 438 - 445
  • [7] Management of stage-I borderline ovarian tumors
    Ji, H
    Yliskoski, M
    Anttila, M
    Syrjanen, K
    Saarikoski, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1996, 54 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [8] STAGE-I BORDERLINE OVARIAN-TUMORS
    CREASMAN, WT
    PARK, R
    NORRIS, H
    DISAIA, PJ
    MORROW, CP
    HRESHCHYSHYN, MM
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 59 (01): : 93 - 96
  • [9] BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS - ARE THEY BENIGN OR MALIGNANT?
    Lazarou, Anastasia
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Coumbos, Alexandra
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Vasiljeva, Jekaterina
    Braicu, Ioana
    Burger, Heinz
    Kuehn, Wolfgang
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (10) : 6257 - 6257
  • [10] Spectropolarimetry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors
    Peresunko, O. P.
    Yermolenko, S. B.
    Gruia, I.
    [J]. THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CORRELATION OPTICS, 2017, 10612