Sharing design definitions across product life cycles

被引:0
|
作者
Amar Kumar Behera
Alison McKay
Christopher F. Earl
Hau Hing Chau
Mark A. Robinson
Alan de Pennington
David C. Hogg
机构
[1] Queen’s University Belfast,School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
[2] University of Leeds,School of Mechanical Engineering
[3] University of Leeds,Leeds University Business School
[4] The Open University,Department of Engineering and Innovation
[5] University of Leeds,School of Computing
来源
关键词
Lattice structures; Qualitative data analysis; Bill of materials; Design definitions; BoM management; Robots;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The research reported in this paper explored the feasibility of embedding multiple design structures into design definitions with a view of sharing design definitions across product life cycles. Two separate case studies using (a) lattice theory and (b) a qualitative data analysis (QDA) software tool were used to illustrate the benefits of embedding. In the first case study, of a robotic arm assembly, lattices in the form of partially ordered sets are used to embed multiple design structures into a given design definition. A software prototype has been built that allows a design bill of materials (BoM) to be extracted from a STEP AP214 file and translated into a lattice that is visualized as a Hasse diagram. This lattice is a sub-lattice of a complete lattice that includes all possible BoM structures for the given collection of component parts in the assembly. New BoM design structures can be defined by selecting the required nodes in the complete lattice and alternative product definitions are then exported as new STEP files. The second case study introduces a collision avoidance robot with associated design structures. It is used to illustrate management of design information using a current technique, design structure matrix (DSM), and compared with how embedding using QDA has the potential to support the establishment of relationships between design structures. Results from these case studies demonstrate that it is feasible to use lattice theory as an underlying formalism and QDA as a means for sharing design definitions.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 361
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sharing design definitions across product life cycles
    Behera, Amar Kumar
    McKay, Alison
    Earl, Christopher F.
    Chau, Hau Hing
    Robinson, Mark A.
    de Pennington, Alan
    Hogg, David C.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2019, 30 (03) : 339 - 361
  • [2] Efficient product data sharing in collaboration life cycles
    Krause, FL
    Hayka, H
    Pasewaldt, B
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DESIGN, 2006, : 365 - +
  • [3] Modeling Service Life Cycles within Product Life Cycles
    Zinke, Christian
    Meyer, Lars-Peter
    Meyer, Kyrill
    [J]. COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS FOR REINDUSTRIALIZATION, 2013, 408 : 335 - 342
  • [4] Study of Life Cycle Design Focusing on Resource Balance throughout Product Life Cycles
    Matsuyama, Yuki
    Matsuno, Tomohiko
    Fukushige, Shinichi
    Umeda, Yasushi
    [J]. 21ST CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2014, 15 : 455 - 460
  • [5] Product life cycles and Ergonomics
    Simlova, Martina
    Krotak, Stanislav
    Edl, Milan
    [J]. INNOVATION VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2012, : 430 - 437
  • [6] Managing product life cycles
    Falcioni, JG
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 121 (04): : 4 - 4
  • [7] Comparison of the life cycles of the NAO using different definitions
    Jia, XiaoJing
    Derome, Jacques
    Lin, Hai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2007, 20 (24) : 5992 - 6011
  • [8] Dynamical properties of product life cycles: Implications to the design and operation of industrial processes
    Chen, YH
    Yu, CC
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2001, 40 (11) : 2452 - 2459
  • [9] Product life cycles, product innovation and firm growth
    Murakami, Hiroki
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 337 (03) : 873 - 890
  • [10] Product life cycles, product innovation and firm growth
    Murakami, Hiroki
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 337 (03) : 873 - 890