Textures shape the attentional focus: Evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing

被引:0
|
作者
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld
Anna Schubö
机构
[1] Germany Philipps-University Marburg,Department of Experimental and Biological Psychology
来源
关键词
Attention; Texture; Visual search; Cueing; Textons;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The spatial cueing paradigm (Posner Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32:3–25, 1980) has often been used to investigate the time course of the deployment of visual attention in space. In a series of eight experiments we investigated whether spatial cues would not only enhance processing of stimuli presented at cued locations, but also enhance processing of the entire texture in which the stimuli were presented. Results showed highest accuracy for responses to stimuli presented at cued locations, a replication of the traditional cueing effect (Posner 1980). Additionally, stimuli presented at uncued locations were responded to with higher accuracy when they were presented inside the same texture as the cued location, as compared with stimuli presented outside the texture with the cued location. To investigate this texture advantage for both automatic and voluntary attention deployment, exogenous and endogenous cues were used. The texture advantage was observed for short interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 50 and 100 ms for exogenous cues and for a longer ISI of 200 ms for endogenous cues. These findings indicate that the arrangement of task-irrelevant visual stimuli also can have a large impact on the cueing effect. This suggests that visual spatial attention spreads texture-wise across the visual field. Control experiments revealed that the homogeneity within texture elements contributes most to the effect but that the texture advantage is a function of both orientation contrast at the texture border and homogeneity within texture elements.
引用
收藏
页码:1644 / 1666
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Textures shape the attentional focus: Evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing
    Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias
    Schuboe, Anna
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (08) : 1644 - 1666
  • [2] Attentional Focus and Cueing for Speed Development
    Winkelman, Nicklaas C.
    STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2018, 40 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [3] The temporal order judgment paradigm: subcortical attentional contribution under exogenous and endogenous cueing conditions
    Zackon, DH
    Casson, EJ
    Zafar, A
    Stelmach, L
    Racette, L
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1999, 37 (05) : 511 - 520
  • [4] Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous cueing in multi-stream RSVP: implications for theories of attentional blink
    Zhang, Dexuan
    Shao, Liping
    Zhou, Xiaolin
    Martens, Sander
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 205 (03) : 415 - 422
  • [5] Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous cueing in multi-stream RSVP: implications for theories of attentional blink
    Dexuan Zhang
    Liping Shao
    Xiaolin Zhou
    Sander Martens
    Experimental Brain Research, 2010, 205 : 415 - 422
  • [6] Separating exogenous from endogenous factors in attentional capture
    Yanko, Matt
    Spalek, Thomas
    Poiese, Paola
    Di Lollo, Vincent
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2008, 62 (04): : 300 - 300
  • [7] Endogenous and exogenous cueing of feature and conjunction search
    Soetens, E
    Deroost, N
    Zeeuws, I
    Henderickx, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 287 - 287
  • [8] The exogenous and endogenous control of attentional focusing
    Jefferies, Lisa N.
    Enns, James T.
    Di Lollo, Vincent
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2019, 83 (05): : 989 - 1006
  • [9] The exogenous and endogenous control of attentional focusing
    Lisa N. Jefferies
    James T. Enns
    Vincent Di Lollo
    Psychological Research, 2019, 83 : 989 - 1006
  • [10] The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making
    Yang, Cheng-Ta
    Little, Daniel R.
    Hsu, Ching-Chun
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (08) : 2256 - 2275