Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries

被引:3
|
作者
Low, Sean [1 ]
Fritz, Livia [1 ]
Baum, Chad M. [1 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Birk Centerpk 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark
[2] Univ Sussex, Business Sch, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Jubilee Bldg,Arts Rd, Falmer BN1, Brighton, England
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, 685 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
DIOXIDE REMOVAL; BIOENERGY; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-024-47853-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Carbon removal is emerging as a pillar of governmental and industry commitments toward achieving Net Zero targets. Drawing from 44 focus groups in 22 countries, we map technical and societal issues that a representative sample of publics raise on five major types of carbon removal (forests, soils, direct air capture, enhanced weathering, and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage), and how these translate to preferences for governance actors, mechanisms, and rationales. We assess gaps and overlaps between a global range of public perceptions and how carbon removal is currently emerging in assessment, innovation, and decision-making. In conclusion, we outline key societal expectations for informing assessment and policy: prioritize public engagement as more than acceptance research; scrutiny and regulation of industry beyond incentivizing innovation; systemic coordination across sectors, levels, and borders; and prioritize underlying causes of climate change and interrelated governance issues. Global public expectations for carbon removal governance are: engagement beyond acceptance research; regulating industry beyond incentivizing innovation; systemic coordination; and prioritizing underlying and interrelated causes of unsustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public perceptions on solar geoengineering from focus groups in 22 countries
    Low, Sean
    Fritz, Livia
    Baum, Chad M.
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [2] Using Focus Groups to Explore Public Perceptions of Legal Rights for Animals
    Broad, Garrett M.
    [J]. ANTHROZOOS, 2020, 33 (05): : 613 - 627
  • [3] Outcomes of camping: Perceptions from camper focus groups
    Bialeschki, MD
    Krehbiel, A
    Henderson, K
    [J]. RESEARCH IN OUTDOOR EDUCATION, Vol 6, 2004, 6 : 147 - 156
  • [4] The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey
    Shackley, S
    McLachlan, C
    Gough, C
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2005, 4 (04) : 377 - 398
  • [5] Adolescent Perceptions of Teen Suicide: Implications from Focus Groups
    Orlins, Erin R.
    Bransteter, Irina
    Chatfield, Sheryl L.
    [J]. YOUTH & SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [6] Perceptions and Evaluations of Incivility in Public Online Discussions-Insights From Focus Groups With Different Online Actors
    Bormann, Marike
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 4
  • [7] Looking Upstream: Findings from Focus Groups on Public Perceptions of Source Water Quality in British Columbia, Canada
    Henrich, Natalie
    Holmes, Bev
    Prystajecky, Natalie
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [8] Climate beliefs, climate technologies and transformation pathways: Contextualizing public perceptions in 22 countries
    Fritz, Livia
    Baum, Chad M.
    Brutschin, Elina
    Low, Sean
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2024, 87
  • [9] Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom
    Emily Cox
    Elspeth Spence
    Nick Pidgeon
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10 : 744 - 749
  • [10] Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom
    Cox, Emily
    Spence, Elspeth
    Pidgeon, Nick
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (08) : 744 - +