Digitization of the Australian Parliamentary Debates, 1998–2022

被引:0
|
作者
Lindsay Katz
Rohan Alexander
机构
[1] University of Toronto,
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Public knowledge of what is said in parliament is a tenet of democracy, and a critical resource for political science research. In Australia, following the British tradition, the written record of what is said in parliament is known as Hansard. While the Australian Hansard has always been publicly available, it has been difficult to use for the purpose of large-scale macro- and micro-level text analysis because it has only been available as PDFs or XMLs. Following the lead of the Linked Parliamentary Data project which achieved this for Canada, we provide a new, comprehensive, high-quality, rectangular database that captures proceedings of the Australian parliamentary debates from 1998 to 2022. The database is publicly available and can be linked to other datasets such as election results. The creation and accessibility of this database enables the exploration of new questions and serves as a valuable resource for both researchers and policymakers.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digitization of the Australian Parliamentary Debates, 1998-2022
    Katz, Lindsay
    Alexander, Rohan
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [2] Digitization of the Canadian Parliamentary Debates
    Beelen, Kaspar
    Alberdingk, Timothy
    Cochrane, Christopher
    Halvemaan, Kees
    Hirst, Graeme
    Kimmins, Michael
    Lijbrink, Sander
    Marx, Maarten
    Naderi, Nona
    Rheault, Ludovic
    Polyanovsky, Roman
    Whyte, Tanya
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2017, 50 (03): : 849 - 864
  • [3] Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers
    Every, Danielle
    Augoustinos, Martha
    DISCOURSE & SOCIETY, 2007, 18 (04) : 411 - 436
  • [4] Stance classification: a comparative study and use case on Australian parliamentary debates
    Stephanie Ng
    James Zhang
    Samson Yu
    Asim Bhatti
    Kathryn Backholer
    C. P. Lim
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2025, 8 (2):
  • [5] Modality in Parliamentary Debates
    Suhai, Dayang Sariah Abang
    Bakar, Kesumawati A.
    Awal, Norsimah Mat
    GEMA ONLINE JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2020, 20 (04): : 186 - 208
  • [6] The power of belief: religious freedom in Australian parliamentary debates on same-sex marriage
    Poulos, Elenie
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 55 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [7] ANALYSIS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OF THE ORGANIC EDUCATION LAWS ENACTED IN SPAIN FROM 1980 TO 2022
    Mantecon Sancho, Joaquin
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2023, (63):
  • [8] Analysis of the parliamentary debates of the organic education laws enacted in Spain from 1980 to 2022
    Garcia, Maria del Mar Martin
    IUS CANONICUM, 2024, 164 (127)
  • [9] Electoral Reform and Parliamentary Debates
    Hoyland, Bjorn
    Soyland, Martin G.
    LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2019, 44 (04) : 593 - 615
  • [10] PHRASEOLOGY AND PRAGMATICS IN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES
    Burguera-Serra, Joan G.
    CIRCULO DE LINGUISTICA APLICADA A LA COMUNICACION, 2016, (65): : 44 - U375