Surgical vs. drug therapy in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke; [Chirurgische vs. medikamentöse Therapie bei Patienten mit offenem Foramen ovale und kryptogenem Schlaganfall]

被引:0
|
作者
Liu Y. [1 ]
Wu Y. [1 ]
Xiong L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiac Electrophysiological Center, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan
关键词
Cryptogenic stroke; Patent foramen ovale; Percutaneous closure; Risk assessment; Therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s00059-020-04921-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of risk scoring for predicting stroke recurrence after percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure or medication therapy in patients with PFO and a history of cryptogenic stroke. Methods: This study included 559 patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke who were treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018 and were followed up for 15–72 months. After calculating the risk scores for stroke recurrence, we randomly divided the patients into two groups (ratio, 1:1): Patients in one group underwent PFO closure and those in the other received drug therapy. Results: Patients in the PFO closure group had a lower risk of recurrent stroke than those in the drug therapy group (1.1% vs. 4.2%). Moreover, serious bleeding was less frequent in the PFO closure group than in the drug therapy group (0% vs. 3.2%), although the incidence of atrial fibrillation or flutter did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.67). Interestingly, a subgroup analysis revealed no inter-treatment group difference in the rate of cryptogenic stroke recurrence among patients with risk scores of 0–1. By contrast, PFO closure yielded superior outcomes among patients with risk scores of ≥2. Conclusion: Compared with drug therapy, PFO closure reduced the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a risk score of ≥2 and reduced the incidence of serious bleeding without increasing the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. © 2020, Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 254
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Surgical vs. drug therapy in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke
    Liu, Yunbing
    Wu, Yi
    Xiong, Lu
    HERZ, 2021, 46 (03) : 250 - 254
  • [2] Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke
    Mas, J. -L.
    Derumeaux, G.
    Guillon, B.
    Massardier, E.
    Hosseini, H.
    Mechtouff, L.
    Arquizan, C.
    Bejot, Y.
    Vuillier, F.
    Detante, O.
    Guidoux, C.
    Canaple, S.
    Vaduva, C.
    Dequatre-Ponchelle, N.
    Sibon, I.
    Garnier, P.
    Ferrier, A.
    Timsit, S.
    Robinet-Borgomano, E.
    Sablot, D.
    Lacour, J. -C.
    Zuber, M.
    Favrole, P.
    Pinel, J. -F.
    Apoil, M.
    Reiner, P.
    Lefebvre, C.
    Guerin, P.
    Piot, C.
    Rossi, R.
    Dubois-Rande, J. -L.
    Eicher, J. -C.
    Meneveau, N.
    Lusson, J. -R.
    Bertrand, B.
    Schleich, J. -M.
    Godart, F.
    Thambo, J. -B.
    Leborgne, L.
    Michel, P.
    Pierard, L.
    Turc, G.
    Barthelet, M.
    Charles-Nelson, A.
    Weimar, C.
    Moulin, T.
    Juliard, J. -M.
    Chatellier, G.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (11): : 1011 - 1021
  • [3] Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: an individual participant data meta-analysis
    Kent, David M.
    Dahabreh, Issa J.
    Ruthazer, Robin
    Furlan, Anthony J.
    Weimar, Christian
    Serena, Joaquin
    Meier, Bernhard
    Mattle, Heinrich P.
    Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
    Paciaroni, Maurizio
    Schuchlenz, Herwig
    Homma, Shunichi
    Lutz, Jennifer S.
    Thaler, David E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (35) : 2381 - 2389
  • [4] PFO-Verschluss bei kryptogenem Schlaganfall – „sollte erwogen werden“!Closure of patent foramen ovale for cryptogenic stroke—“should be considered”!
    J. Röther
    M. Köhrmann
    T. Steiner
    H. Steinmetz
    Der Nervenarzt, 2018, 89 (10) : 1154 - 1155
  • [5] Patent foramen ovale closure vs. medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: ameta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ahmad, Yousif
    Howard, James P.
    Arnold, Ahran
    Shin, Matthew Shun
    Cook, Christopher
    Petraco, Ricardo
    Demir, Ozan
    Williams, Luke
    Iglesias, Juan F.
    Sutaria, Nilesh
    Malik, Iqbal
    Davies, Justin
    Mayet, Jamil
    Francis, Darrel
    Sen, Sayan
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (18) : 1638 - 1649
  • [6] Case Report: Hypereosinophilic syndrome vs. patent foramen ovale as etiopathogenetic contributors to stroke
    Liu, Xiangjuan
    Sun, Congcong
    An, Guipeng
    Cao, Lili
    Meng, Xiao
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 10
  • [7] Interventional closure vs. medical therapy of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of stroke: updated meta-analysis
    Davor Vukadinović
    Stephan H. Schirmer
    Aleksandra Nikolovska Vukadinović
    Christian Ukena
    Bruno Scheller
    Felix Mahfoud
    Michael Böhm
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2019, 108 : 157 - 166
  • [8] Interventional closure vs. medical therapy of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of stroke: updated meta-analysis
    Shah, Syed Raza
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 108 (04) : 452 - 452
  • [9] Interventional closure vs. medical therapy of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of stroke: updated meta-analysis
    Vukadinovic, Davor
    Schirmer, Stephan H.
    Vukadinovic, Aleksandra Nikolovska
    Ukena, Christian
    Scheller, Bruno
    Mahfoud, Felix
    Boehm, Michael
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 108 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [10] Interventional closure vs. medical therapy of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of stroke: updated meta-analysis
    Syed Raza Shah
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2019, 108 : 452 - 452