Conventional and innovative extraction methods applied on Calligonum azel Maire leaves and roots: a comparative study

被引:0
|
作者
Marwa Bannour
Ayda Khadhri
Petras Rimantas Venskutonis
Renata Baranauskiene
Dirk W. Lachenmeier
机构
[1] University of El-Manar II,Unit of Research of Plant Ecology
[2] Faculty of Sciences,Department of Food Science and Technology
[3] Kaunas University of Technology,undefined
[4] Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe,undefined
来源
关键词
Antioxidant capacity; Maire; Essential oil; Pressurized liquid extraction; Supercritical fluid extraction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two extraction schemes, conventional and high-pressure extraction methods were applied on Calligonum azel Maire leaves and roots, with purpose to exploit this plant as a source of natural antioxidants. The total phenolic content (TPC), trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) of extracts, and solid materials were determined. Varying yields of active fractions were obtained by consecutive extractions with increasing polarity solvents. In the Soxhlet extraction, the highest antioxidant capacity values were obtained with methanol, while in the pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), the highest TEAC was recorded in acetone extracts for both materials. The changes of antioxidant indicators of solid plant materials during the extraction were studied by the so-called QUENCHER method (QU: quick, E: Easy, N: New, CHE: Cheap, and R: Reproducible). In this case, TPC varied in the range of 2.3–60.5 expressed in mg gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry weight of plant (mg GAE/g DWP), while radical scavenging capacity was 1.7–75.4 micromole Trolox equivalent per gram of dry weight of plant material (µmol TE/g DWP). All extracts were analysed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and the results showed thirteen compounds including flavonoids. The essential oils extracted by hydrodistillation, were screened by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and the results showed the presence of 82 and 55 compounds in C. azel leaves and roots, representing 97.6% and 83.4% of the oil, respectively, while in the supercritical fluid extraction using CO2, both materials showed 52 and 50 compounds, representing over 98.7% and 71.5% of the oil.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 649
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conventional and innovative extraction methods applied on Calligonum azel Maire leaves and roots: a comparative study
    Bannour, Marwa
    Khadhri, Ayda
    Venskutonis, Petras Rimantas
    Baranauskiene, Renata
    Lachenmeier, Dirk W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 247 (03) : 637 - 649
  • [2] Comparative Investigation of Conventional and Innovative Headspace Extraction Methods to Explore the Volatile Content of Human Milk
    Le Roy, Sarah
    Fillonneau, Catherine
    Schaal, Benoist
    Prost, Carole
    Villiere, Angelique
    [J]. MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (16):
  • [3] Comparative study of liquid–liquid extraction in miniaturized channels over other conventional extraction methods
    M. S. Giri Nandagopal
    Rahul Antony
    N. Selvaraju
    [J]. Microsystem Technologies, 2016, 22 : 349 - 356
  • [4] Feature extraction methods applied to the clustering of electrocardiographic signals.: A comparative study
    Cuesta-Frau, D
    Pérez-Cortés, JC
    Andreu-García, G
    Novák, D
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 961 - 964
  • [5] A Comparative Study of TESS Light-curve Extraction Methods Applied to Blazars
    Poore, Ethan
    Carini, Michael
    Dingler, Ryne
    Wehrle, Ann E.
    Wiita, Paul J.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 966 (02):
  • [6] Comparative study of liquid-liquid extraction in miniaturized channels over other conventional extraction methods
    Nandagopal, M. S. Giri
    Antony, Rahul
    Selvaraju, N.
    [J]. MICROSYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES-MICRO-AND NANOSYSTEMS-INFORMATION STORAGE AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2016, 22 (02): : 349 - 356
  • [7] Tree Leaves Extraction in Natural Images: Comparative Study of Preprocessing Tools and Segmentation Methods
    Grand-Brochier, Manuel
    Vacavant, Antoine
    Cerutti, Guillaume
    Kurtz, Camille
    Weber, Jonathan
    Tougne, Laure
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 24 (05) : 1549 - 1560
  • [8] Comparative study of conventional and pressurized liquid extraction for recovering bioactive compounds from Lippia citriodora leaves
    Javier Leyva-Jimenez, Francisco
    Lozano-Sanchez, Jesus
    Borras-Linares, Isabel
    Arraez-Roman, David
    Segura-Carretero, Antonio
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 109 : 213 - 222
  • [9] A comparative study of feature extraction methods applied to continuous speech recognition in Romanian language
    Dumitru, Corneliu Octavian
    Gavat, Inge
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ELMAR-2006, 2006, : 115 - +
  • [10] Evaluation of protein extraction methods for enhanced proteomic analysis of tomato leaves and roots
    Vilhena, Milca B.
    Franco, Monica R.
    Schmidt, Daiana
    Carvalho, Giselle
    Azevedo, Ricardo A.
    [J]. ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2015, 87 (03): : 1853 - 1863