An improved multi-criteria emergency decision-making method in environmental disasters

被引:0
|
作者
Guang-Jun Jiang
Hong-Xia Chen
Hong-Hua Sun
Mohammad Yazdi
Arman Nedjati
Kehinde Adewale Adesina
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia University of Technology,School of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Sun Yat-Sen University,School of Intelligent Systems Engineering
[3] Quchan University of Technology,Industrial Engineering Department
[4] Near East University,Industrial Engineering Department
来源
Soft Computing | 2021年 / 25卷
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; TOPSIS; Pythagorean fuzzy set; Chebyshev distance measure; Structural safety and reliability; Environmental clean prospective;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods deeply assist decision-makers in evaluating and analyzing input data as accurately as possible in the area of safety and reliability. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) can be used to rank a set of alternatives based on the different types of criteria. However, this method still needs to be improved; fuzzy set theory and its corresponding extensions are bold in the line of TOPSIS improvement. In this study, the original form of TOPSIS method is extended using Pythagorean fuzzy-based Chebyshev distance measures. Pythagorean fuzzy set has better reflection compared to the conventional fuzzy set theory and Chebyshev distance measures can provide more accurate results, which are used to compute the separation measures in the TOPSIS method. Therefore, the novel improved TOPSIS methods have been developed underlying the ideal of Pythagorean fuzzy-based Chebyshev distance measures. The developed method is applied on a humanitarian case-study to show the efficiency of the approach in an emergency response situation. Results show that the proposed method is efficiently applicable in real-life decision-making situations.
引用
收藏
页码:10351 / 10379
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An improved multi-criteria emergency decision-making method in environmental disasters
    Jiang, Guang-Jun
    Chen, Hong-Xia
    Sun, Hong-Hua
    Yazdi, Mohammad
    Nedjati, Arman
    Adesina, Kehinde Adewale
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (15) : 10351 - 10379
  • [2] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [3] Utilization of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Emergency Management
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammel, Robert J., II
    [J]. COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2021, 25 (04): : 863 - 872
  • [4] MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS METHOD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING IN PORT ACTIVITIES
    Florin, Nicolae
    Catalin, Popa
    Haralambie, Beizadea
    Mihaela, Popescu
    [J]. GEOCONFERENCE ON ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, SGEM 2013, VOL II, 2013, : 201 - 208
  • [5] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [7] Multi-criteria group emergency decision-making method considering knowledge granularity
    Wang, Su-Su
    Du, Yuan-Wei
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 163
  • [8] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [9] The Improved CURLI Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Nguyen, Anh-Tu
    [J]. ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (01) : 10121 - 10127
  • [10] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865