Complications of the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term follow-up study

被引:0
|
作者
Ja Hyeon Ku
Won Jun Choi
Kwang Yeom Lee
Tae Young Jung
Jeong Ki Lee
Won Hee Park
Hong Bang Shim
机构
[1] Seoul Veterans Hospital,Department of Urology
[2] College of medicine,Department of Urology
来源
Urological Research | 2005年 / 33卷
关键词
Spinal cord injury; Urinary catheterization; Complication; Neurogenic bladder;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to establish hazard ratios for the risk of complications of the upper urinary tract in relation to bladder management methods in patients with spinal cord injury. A total of 179 male patients were eligible for this investigation which was followed-up on a yearly basis until 2003. The average age at which the lesion occurred was 25.2 years (range 18–57). The average duration of follow-up since SCI was 29.3 years (range 10–53). During follow-up, the incidence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was 15.1%. A total of 61 (34.1%) and 44 (24.6%) patients were diagnosed with pyelonephritis and renal stones, respectively. There were no significant differences in these complications among groups. Upper tract deterioration (UTD) was observed in 58 patients (32.4%). The incidence of UTD in the urethral catheter group (51.7%) was higher than that in other groups (P=0.008). Using multivariate analysis, patients with VUR were shown to have a higher risk of pyelonephritis (odds ratio 2.78; 95% confidence interval 1.16–6.68), and UTD (odds ratio 22.10; 95% confidence interval 6.92–70.56). We also found that UTD was more common for patients with an indwelling urethral catheter than for patients using other methods. For other variables, no positive association was observed. In cases which cannot undergo intermittent catheterization, or when the bladder cannot empty spontaneously, a suprapubic catheter is better than a urethral catheter for reducing UTD in this population. These findings suggest that even at a late stage post injury, bladder management methods are still important.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 439
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications of the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal cord injury: a long-term follow-up study
    Ku, JH
    Choi, WJ
    Lee, KY
    Jung, TY
    Lee, JK
    Park, WH
    Shim, HB
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (06): : 435 - 439
  • [2] Long-term follow-up study of patients with spinal cord injury
    Moosavi, Najme-Sadat
    Emami, Zahra
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
    NEUROSCIENCES, 2013, 18 (04) : 385 - 387
  • [3] Long-term follow-up of patients with spinal cord injury
    Yilmaz, F
    Sahin, F
    Aktug, S
    Kuran, B
    Yimaz, A
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2005, 19 (04) : 332 - 337
  • [4] Vesicostomy as a Protector of Upper Urinary Tract in Long-Term Follow-Up
    Prudente, Alessandro
    Reis, Leonardo Oliveira
    Franca, Rodrigo de Paula
    Miranda, Marcio
    Levi D'ancona, Carlos Arturo
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 6 (02) : 96 - 100
  • [5] SPINAL-CORD INJURY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF VETERANS
    DEYOE, FS
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1972, 53 (11): : 523 - &
  • [6] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF SPINAL-CORD INJURY PATIENTS WITH VESICOURETERAL REFLUX
    LAMID, S
    PARAPLEGIA, 1988, 26 (01): : 27 - 34
  • [7] Long-term urodynamic follow-up in patients with spinal cord injury: Is it really necessary?
    Pannek, J
    Nosseir, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 334 - 334
  • [8] Chronic abdominal pain in long-term spinal cord injury: a follow-up study
    Nielsen, S. D.
    Faaborg, P. M.
    Christensen, P.
    Krogh, K.
    Finnerup, N. B.
    SPINAL CORD, 2017, 55 (03) : 290 - 293
  • [9] Chronic abdominal pain in long-term spinal cord injury: a follow-up study
    S D Nielsen
    P M Faaborg
    P Christensen
    K Krogh
    N B Finnerup
    Spinal Cord, 2017, 55 : 290 - 293
  • [10] Compliance with clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: a long-term follow-up study
    S I Afsar
    O U Yemisci
    S N S Cosar
    N Cetin
    Spinal Cord, 2013, 51 : 645 - 649