Comparing the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Victoria Rotshild
Bruria Hirsh-Raccah
Ian Miskin
Mordechai Muszkat
Ilan Matok
机构
[1] The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,Pharmacoepidemiology Research Unit, Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Clalith Health Services Community Division,Jerusalem Distric
[3] Hadassah University Hospital Ein Karem,Department of Cardiology
[4] Hadassah University Hospital Mt. Scopus,Department of Medicine
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
New Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are available to prevent the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. We compared the efficacy of new COVID-19 vaccines to prevent symptomatic and severe disease in the adult population and to prevent symptomatic COVID-19 among the elderly. Leading medical databases were searched until August 30, 2021. Published phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated efficacy of the vaccine to prevent symptomatic and sever COVID-19 in adults were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated the literature search results and independently extracted summary data. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) according to PRISMA-NMA 2015 to pool indirect comparisons between different vaccines regarding their relative efficacy. The primary outcomes were the efficacy of the vaccine against symptomatic COVID-19 in adults (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021235364). Above 200,000 adult participants from eight phase 3 RCTs were included in NMA, of whom 52% received the intervention (active COVID-19 vaccine). While each of nine vaccines was tested in the unique clinical trial as compared to control, based on indirect comparison, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines were ranked with the highest probability of efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 (P-scores 0.952 and 0.843, respectively), followed by Gam-COVID-Vac (P-score 0.782), NVX-CoV23730 (P-score 0.700), CoronaVac (P-score 0.570), BN02 (P-score 0.428), WIV04 (P-score 0.327), and Ad26.COV2.S (P-score 0.198). No statistically significant difference was seen in the ability of the vaccines to prevent symptomatic disease in the elderly population. No vaccine was statistically significantly associated with a decreased risk for severe COVID-19 than other vaccines, although mRNA-1273 and Gam-COVID-Vac have the highest P-scores (0.899 and 0.816, respectively), indicating greater protection against severe disease than other vaccines. In our indirect comparison, the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, which use mRNA technology, were associated with the highest efficacy to prevent symptomatic COVID-19 compared to other vaccines. This finding may have importance when deciding which vaccine to use, together with other important factors as availability of the vaccines, costs, logistics, side effects, and patient acceptability.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Rotshild, Victoria
    Hirsh-Raccah, Bruria
    Miskin, Ian
    Muszkat, Mordechai
    Matok, Ilan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] Comparing reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sutton, Natalina
    Ramos, Alberto San Francisco
    Beales, Emily
    Smith, David
    Ikram, Sabina
    Galiza, Eva
    Hsia, Yingfen
    Heath, Paul T.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (09) : 1301 - 1318
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Pormohammad, Ali
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Ghorbani, Saied
    Mohammadi, Mehdi
    Razizadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    Turner, Diana L.
    Turner, Raymond J.
    [J]. VACCINES, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [4] Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin
    Wong, Shi Yin
    Chai, Louis Yi Ann
    Lee, Soo Chin
    Lee, Matilda Xinwei
    Muthiah, Mark Dhinesh
    Tay, Sen Hee
    Teo, Chong Boon
    Tan, Benjamin Kye Jyn
    Chan, Yiong Huak
    Sundar, Raghav
    Soon, Yu Yang
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 376 : e068632
  • [5] Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sharif, Nadim
    Alzahrani, Khalid J.
    Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar
    Dey, Shuvra Kanti
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [6] Sex Disparities in Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bignucolo, Alessia
    Scarabel, Lucia
    Mezzalira, Silvia
    Polesel, Jerry
    Cecchin, Erika
    Toffoli, Giuseppe
    [J]. VACCINES, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: A network meta-analysis
    Toubasi, Ahmad A.
    Al-Sayegh, Thuraya N.
    Obaid, Yazan Y.
    Al-Harasis, Sarah M.
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (03) : 245 - 262
  • [8] Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
    Beladiya, Jayesh
    Kumar, Anup
    Vasava, Yogesh
    Parmar, Krupanshu
    Patel, Dipanshi
    Patel, Sandip
    Dholakia, Sandip
    Sheth, Devang
    Boddu, Sai H. S.
    Patel, Chirag
    [J]. REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 34 (01)
  • [9] Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Different Vaccines at Phase 3
    Fan, Yu-Jing
    Chan, Kwok-Hung
    Hung, Ivan Fan-Ngai
    [J]. VACCINES, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [10] Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
    Kumar, Subodh
    Saikia, Dibyajyoti
    Bankar, Mangesh
    Saurabh, Manoj Kumar
    Singh, Harminder
    Varikasuvu, Sheshadri Reddy
    Maharshi, Vikas
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2022, 74 (06) : 1228 - 1237