Rapid-cycle systems modeling to support evidence-informed decision-making during system-wide implementation

被引:5
|
作者
Sheldrick, R. Christopher [1 ]
Cruden, Gracelyn [2 ]
Schaefer, Ana J. [3 ]
Mackie, Thomas I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Law Policy & Management, One Silber Way, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Oregon Social Learning Ctr, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR USA
[3] SUNY, Downstate Hlth Sci Univ, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY USA
来源
关键词
Computer simulation; Epistemology; Implementation science; Evidence-based practice; Psychological trauma; Screening; HEALTH-CARE; MENTAL-HEALTH; SCIENCE; INSIGHTS; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-021-00218-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To "model and simulate change" is an accepted strategy to support implementation at scale. Much like a power analysis can inform decisions about study design, simulation models offer an analytic strategy to synthesize evidence that informs decisions regarding implementation of evidence-based interventions. However, simulation modeling is under-utilized in implementation science. To realize the potential of simulation modeling as an implementation strategy, additional methods are required to assist stakeholders to use models to examine underlying assumptions, consider alternative strategies, and anticipate downstream consequences of implementation. To this end, we propose Rapid-cycle Systems Modeling (RCSM)-a form of group modeling designed to promote engagement with evidence to support implementation. To demonstrate its utility, we provide an illustrative case study with mid-level administrators developing system-wide interventions that aim to identify and treat trauma among children entering foster care.Methods RCSM is an iterative method that includes three steps per cycle: (1) identify and prioritize stakeholder questions, (2) develop or refine a simulation model, and (3) engage in dialogue regarding model relevance, insights, and utility for implementation. For the case study, 31 key informants were engaged in step 1, a prior simulation model was adapted for step 2, and six member-checking group interviews (n = 16) were conducted for step 3.Results Step 1 engaged qualitative methods to identify and prioritize stakeholder questions, specifically identifying a set of inter-related decisions to promote implementing trauma-informed screening. In step 2, the research team created a presentation to communicate key findings from the simulation model that addressed decisions about programmatic reach, optimal screening thresholds to balance demand for treatment with supply, capacity to start-up and sustain screening, and availability of downstream capacity to provide treatment for those with indicated need. In step 3, member-checking group interviews with stakeholders documented the relevance of the model results to implementation decisions, insight regarding opportunities to improve system performance, and potential to inform conversations regarding anticipated implications of implementation choices.Conclusions By embedding simulation modeling in a process of stakeholder engagement, RCSM offers guidance to realize the potential of modeling not only as an analytic strategy, but also as an implementation strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DECISION-MAKING ALIGNED WITH RAPID-CYCLE EVALUATION IN HEALTH CARE
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    Shrank, William H.
    Ruhl, Michael
    Maclure, Malcolm
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (04) : 214 - 222
  • [2] A framework for production of systematic review based briefings to support evidence-informed decision-making
    Chambers D.
    Wilson P.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 1 (1)
  • [3] Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making
    Jennifer Yost
    Maureen Dobbins
    Robyn Traynor
    Kara DeCorby
    Stephanie Workentine
    Lori Greco
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 14
  • [4] Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making
    Yost, Jennifer
    Dobbins, Maureen
    Traynor, Robyn
    DeCorby, Kara
    Workentine, Stephanie
    Greco, Lori
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [5] Cynefin Framework for Evidence-Informed Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making
    Lunghi, Christian
    Baroni, Francesca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2019, 119 (05): : 312 - 321
  • [6] Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector– a rapid evidence review
    Germán Andrés Alarcón Garavito
    Thomas Moniz
    Cristián Mansilla
    Syka Iqbal
    Rozalia Dobrogowska
    Fiona Bennin
    Shivangi Talwar
    Ahmad Firas Khalid
    Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [7] Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies
    Michelle M. Haby
    Evelina Chapman
    Rachel Clark
    Jorge Barreto
    Ludovic Reveiz
    John N. Lavis
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [8] Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies
    Haby, Michelle M.
    Chapman, Evelina
    Clark, Rachel
    Barreto, Jorge
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Lavis, John N.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [9] The Swiss Learning Health System: a national initiative supporting evidence-informed decision-making
    Mantwill, S.
    Wicki, T. Kasper
    Boes, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 : V67 - V67
  • [10] Evidence-Informed Managerial Decision-Making: what evidence counts? (Part Two)
    Liang, Z.
    Howard, P.
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2011, 6 (02): : 12 - 21