O-RADS MRI scoring system: key points for correct application in inexperienced hands

被引:1
|
作者
Cabedo, Lledo [1 ]
Sebastia, Carmen [1 ]
Munmany, Meritxell [2 ]
Fuste, Pere [2 ]
Gaba, Lydia [3 ]
Saco, Adela [4 ,5 ]
Rodriguez, Adela [3 ,5 ]
Pano, Blanca [1 ]
Nicolau, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Radiol, C Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, C Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[3] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Oncol, C Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Pathol, C Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[5] August Pi I Sunyer Biomed Res Inst IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Cancer; MRI; Ovary; OVARIAN-CANCER; VALIDATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-024-01670-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the O-RADS MRI criteria in the stratification of risk of malignancy of solid or sonographically indeterminate ovarian masses and assess the interobserver agreement of this classification between experienced and inexperienced radiologists.Methods This single-centre retrospective study included patients from 2019 to 2022 with sonographically indeterminate or solid ovarian masses who underwent MRI with a specific protocol for characterisation according to O-RADS MRI specifications. Each study was evaluated using O-RADS lexicon by two radiologists, one with 17 years of experience in gynaecological radiology and another with 4 years of experience in general radiology. Findings were classified as benign, borderline, or malignant according to histology or stability over time. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were assessed.Results A total of 183 patients with US indeterminate or solid adnexal masses were included. Fifty-seven (31%) did not have ovarian masses, classified as O-RADS 1. The diagnostic performance for scores 2-5 was excellent with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 97.4%, 100%, 96.2%, and 100%, respectively by the experienced radiologist and 96.1%, 92.0%, 93.9%, and 94.8% by the inexperienced radiologist. Interobserver concordance was very high (Kappa index 0.92). Almost all the misclassified cases were due to misinterpretation of the classification similar to reports in the literature.Conclusion The diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI determined by either experienced or inexperienced radiologists is excellent, facilitating decision-making with high diagnostic accuracy and high reproducibility. Knowledge of this classification and use of assessment tools could avoid frequent errors due to misinterpretation.Critical relevance statement Up to 31% of ovarian masses are considered indeterminate by transvaginal US and 32% of solid lesions considered malignant by transvaginal US are benign. The O-RADs MRI accurately classifies these masses, even when used by inexperienced radiologists, thereby avoiding incorrect surgical approaches.Key points center dot O-RADS MRI accurately classifies indeterminate and solid ovarian masses by ultrasound. center dot There is excellent interobserver agreement between experienced and non-experienced radiologists. center dot O-RADS MRI is a helpful tool to assess clinical decision-making in ovarian tumours.Key points center dot O-RADS MRI accurately classifies indeterminate and solid ovarian masses by ultrasound. center dot There is excellent interobserver agreement between experienced and non-experienced radiologists. center dot O-RADS MRI is a helpful tool to assess clinical decision-making in ovarian tumours.Key points center dot O-RADS MRI accurately classifies indeterminate and solid ovarian masses by ultrasound. center dot There is excellent interobserver agreement between experienced and non-experienced radiologists. center dot O-RADS MRI is a helpful tool to assess clinical decision-making in ovarian tumours.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] O-RADS MRI scoring system has the potential to reduce the frequency of avoidable adnexal surgery
    Dabi, Yohann
    Rockall, Andrea
    Razakamanantsoa, Leo
    Guerra, Adalgisa
    Fournier, Laure S.
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Touboul, Cyril
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 294 : 135 - 142
  • [2] Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI
    Sadowski, Elizabeth A.
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    Rockall, Andrea
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Addley, Helen
    Jha, Priyanka
    Bharwani, Nishat
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1125):
  • [3] O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee
    Sadowski, Elizabeth A.
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Rockall, Andrea
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    Forstner, Rosemarie
    Jha, Priyanka
    Nougaret, Stephanie
    Siegelman, Evan S.
    Reinhold, Caroline
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (01) : 35 - 47
  • [4] US and MRI O-RADS classification
    Boisselier, Antonia
    Jalaguier-Coudray, Aurelie
    Mahjoub-Villard, Rim
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2020, 30 (04) : 153 - 164
  • [5] O-RADS scoring system for adnexal lesions: Diagnostic performance on TVUS performed by an expert sonographer and MRI
    Campos, Audrey
    Villermain-Lecolier, Camille
    Sadowski, Elizabeth A.
    Bazot, Marc
    Touboul, Cyril
    Razakamanantsoa, Leo
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 169
  • [6] Impact of Adding Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADCmean) Measurements to O-RADS MRI Scoring For Adnexal Lesions Characterization: A Combined O-RADS MRI/ADCmean Approach
    Elshetry, Al Shaimaa Fathi
    Hamed, Enas Mahmoud
    Frere, Reem Abdel Fattah
    Zaid, Nesma Adel
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02) : 300 - 311
  • [7] O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: pearls and pitfalls
    Stephanie Nougaret
    Leo Razakamanantsoa
    Elizabeth A. Sadowski
    Erica B. Stein
    Yulia Lakhman
    Nicole M. Hindman
    Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray
    Andrea G. Rockall
    Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
    Insights into Imaging, 15
  • [8] O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: pearls and pitfalls
    Nougaret, Stephanie
    Razakamanantsoa, Leo
    Sadowski, Elizabeth A.
    Stein, Erica B.
    Lakhman, Yulia
    Hindman, Nicole M.
    Jalaguier-Coudray, Aurelie
    Rockall, Andrea G.
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [9] Reliability, reproducibility, and potential pitfalls of the O-RADS scoring with non-dynamic MRI
    Kılıçkap, Gulsum
    Dölek, Betül Akdal
    Kaya, Serhat
    Çevik, Numan Ilteriş
    Acta Radiologica, 2024, 65 (12) : 1560 - 1568
  • [10] Performance of O-RADS MRI Score in Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Teratomas: MR Feature Analysis for Differentiating O-RADS 4 From O-RADS 2
    Petrocelli, Robert
    Doshi, Ankur
    Slywotzky, Chrystia
    Savino, Marissa
    Melamud, Kira
    Tong, Angela
    Hindman, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2024, 48 (05) : 749 - 758