Risk-based standards: Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches

被引:43
|
作者
Linkov I. [1 ]
Anklam E. [2 ]
Collier Z.A. [1 ]
DiMase D. [3 ]
Renn O. [4 ]
机构
[1] United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA
[2] Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, European Commission's Joint Research Centre, Geel
[3] G-19A Test Laboratory Standards Development Committee, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA
[4] University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart
关键词
Cybersecurity; Nanotechnology; Policy; Resilience; Risk assessment; Risk management; Security;
D O I
10.1007/s10669-014-9488-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In response to rapidly changing threats posed to increasingly complex socio-technical systems, many in the government and private sector have called for protection through risk-based standards. However, given the nature of these dynamic and uncertain threats, traditional risk assessment techniques may not be sufficient. Instead, there is a critical need for an integrated approach in which decision analytic techniques are used to assess evidence-based data with the values and preferences of decision makers. We point to three examples in the fields of nuclear power regulation, nanotechnology, and cybersecurity, where risk-based approaches (bottom-up) have been combined with decision analysis (top-down) to guide decision makers toward risk management policies that manifest both the best available evidence and the plurality of values within a society. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA).
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 137
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Top-down versus bottom-up approaches in proteomics
    Wehr, Tim
    [J]. LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 24 (09) : 1004 - +
  • [3] General modelling approaches: Top-down or bottom-up?
    Worsley, TE
    Harris, RCE
    [J]. NATIONAL TRANSPORT MODELS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS, 2002, : 57 - 60
  • [4] TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP APPROACHES TO PROJECT SELECTION
    不详
    [J]. RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, 1978, 21 (02): : 22 - 24
  • [5] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Company Competitiveness
    Kotik, Vitezslav
    Voracek, Jan
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS (IFKAD 2020): KNOWLEDGE IN DIGITAL AGE, 2020, : 100 - 119
  • [6] Sustainability and uncertainty: Bottom-up and top-down approaches
    Jensen, K. Klint
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 6 : 853 - 855
  • [7] Integrating Top-Down with Bottom-Up Conservation Policy in Africa
    Abrams, R. W.
    Anwana, Eno D.
    Ormsby, Alison
    Dovie, Delali B. K.
    Ajagbe, Ademola
    Abrams, Amber
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) : 799 - 804
  • [8] Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies
    Foulkes, David
    Domhoff, G. William
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 27 : 168 - 171
  • [9] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cognitive Approaches in mTBI Rehabilitation
    Vas, A.
    Luedtke, A.
    Ortiz, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2020, 35 (02) : E244 - E244
  • [10] Artificial morality: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches
    Allen C.
    Smit I.
    Wallach W.
    [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2005, 7 (3) : 149 - 155