Impact of the selection of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of green concrete (vol 22, pg 1969, 2017)

被引:1
|
作者
Panesar, Daman K. [1 ]
Seto, Karina E. [1 ]
Churchill, Cameron J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, 35 St,George St, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Engn & Soc Program, 1280Main,St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
来源
关键词
Compressive strength; Concrete; Durability; Functional unit; Life cycle assessment; Limestone cement; Rapid chloride permeability; Silica fume; Slag;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-017-1350-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The objectives of this study are to evaluate life cycle assessment (LCA) for concrete mix designs containing alternative cement replacement materials in comparison with conventional 100% general use cement concrete and to evaluate the interplay and sensitivity of LCA for four concrete mix designs and six functional units which range in degrees of complexity and variables. Methods Six functional units with varying degrees of complexity are included in the analysis: (i) volume of concrete, (ii) volume and 28-day compressive strength, (iii) volume and 28-day rapid chloride permeability (RCP), (iv) volume and binder intensity, (v) volume and a combination of compressive strength and RCP and (vi) volume and a combination of binder intensity and RCP. Four reference flows are included in the analysis: three concrete mix designs containing slag, silica fume and limestone cement as cement replacement and one concrete mix design for conventional concrete. Results and discussion All three alternative mix designs were evaluated to have lower environmental impacts compared with the base 100% general use cement and so are considered to be 'green' concrete. Similar LCA results were observed for FU1, FU2 and FU4, and relatively similar results were obtained for FU3, FU5 and FU6. LCA conducted with functional units which were a function of durability exhibited markedly different (lower) LCA compared with the functional units that did not capture long-term durability. Conclusions Outcomes of this study portray the interplay between concrete mix design materials, choice of functional unit and environmental impact based on LCA. The results emphasize (i) the non-linearity between material properties and environmental impact and (ii) the importance of conducting an LCA with a selected functional unit that captures the concrete's functional performance metrics specific to its application and expected exposure conditions. Based on this study, it is recommended that a complete LCA for a given concrete mix design should entail examination of multiple functional units in order to identify the range of environmental impacts or the optimal environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:1987 / 1988
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Erratum to: Impact of the selection of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of green concrete
    Daman K. Panesar
    Karina E. Seto
    Cameron J. Churchill
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1987 - 1988
  • [2] Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment (vol 26, pg 435, 2021)
    de Simone Souza, Hugo Henrique
    de Abreu Evangelista, Patricia Pereira
    Medeiros, Diego Lima
    Alberti, Jaume
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Boncz, Marc Arpad
    Kiperstok, Asher
    Goncalves, Jardel Pereira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (02): : 354 - 354
  • [3] ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level (vol 22, pg 138, 2017)
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Steinmann, Zoran J. N.
    Elshout, Pieter M. F.
    Stam, Gea
    Verones, Francesca
    Vieira, Marisa
    Zijp, Michiel
    Hollander, Anne
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (08): : 1635 - 1635
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of biomass densification systems (vol 107, pg 384, 2017)
    Muazu, Rukayya Ibrahim
    Borrion, Aiduan Li
    Stegemann, Julia A.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2020, 135
  • [5] Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment
    Hugo Henrique de Simone Souza
    Patrícia Pereira de Abreu Evangelista
    Diego Lima Medeiros
    Jaume Albertí
    Pere Fullana-i-Palmer
    Marc Árpád Boncz
    Asher Kiperstok
    Jardel Pereira Gonçalves
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 435 - 454
  • [6] Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment
    de Simone Souza, Hugo Henrique
    de Abreu Evangelista, Patricia Pereira
    Medeiros, Diego Lima
    Alberti, Jaume
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Boncz, Marc Arpad
    Kiperstok, Asher
    Goncalves, Jardel Pereira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (03): : 435 - 454
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of chitosan production in India and Europe (vol 23, pg 1151, 2017)
    Munoz, Ivan
    Rodriguez, Cristina
    Gillet, Dominique
    Moerschbacher, Bruno M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (05): : 1161 - 1162
  • [8] Correction to: Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment
    Hugo Henrique de Simone Souza
    Patrícia Pereira de Abreu Evangelista
    Diego Lima Medeiros
    Jaume Albertí
    Pere Fullana–i–Palmer
    Marc Árpád Boncz
    Asher Kiperstok
    Jardel Pereira Gonçalves
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 354 - 354
  • [9] Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries
    Julien Matheys
    Wout Van Autenboer
    Jean-Marc Timmermans
    Joeri Van Mierlo
    Peter Van den Bossche
    Gaston Maggetto
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 191 - 196
  • [10] Influence of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of traction batteries
    Matheys, Julien
    Van Autenboer, Wout
    Timmermans, Jean-Marc
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Van den Bossche, Peter
    Maggetto, Gaston
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (03): : 191 - 196