A normative study of the Italian printed word version of the free and cued selective reminding test

被引:0
|
作者
N. Girtler
F. De Carli
M. Amore
D. Arnaldi
L. E. Bosia
C. Bruzzaniti
S. F. Cappa
L. Cocito
G. Colazzo
L. Ghio
E. Magi
G. L. Mancardi
F. Nobili
M. Pardini
A. Picco
R. Rissotto
C. Serrati
A. Brugnolo
机构
[1] DINOGMI University of Genoa,Clinical Neurology
[2] IRCCS San Martino-IST,Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Unit
[3] Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology,Clinical Psychiatry
[4] National Research Council,Clinical Neurology
[5] DINOGMI University of Genoa,undefined
[6] IRCCS San Martino-IST,undefined
[7] IUSS Pavia and San Raffaele Scientific Institute,undefined
[8] C.H. La Palmosa,undefined
[9] Accueil de Jour Alzheimer,undefined
[10] Centre Hospitalier La Palmosa,undefined
[11] Menton Division of Neuroscience,undefined
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2015年 / 36卷
关键词
Italian normative; Memory test; Semantic cues; Alzheimer’s disease; FCSRT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
According to the new research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, episodic memory impairment, not significantly improved by cueing, is the core neuropsychological marker, even at a pre-dementia stage. The FCSRT assesses verbal learning and memory using semantic cues and is widely used in Europe. Standardization values for the Italian population are available for the colored picture version, but not for the 16-item printed word version. In this study, we present age- and education-adjusted normative data for FCSRT-16 obtained using linear regression techniques and generalized linear model, and critical values for classifying sub-test performance into equivalent scores. Six scores were derived from the performance of 194 normal subjects (MMSE score, range 27–30, mean 29.5 ± 0.5) divided per decade (from 20 to 90), per gender and per level of education (4 levels: 3–5, 6–8, 9–13, >13 years): immediate free recall (IFR), immediate total recall (ITR), recognition phase (RP), delayed free recall (DFR), delayed total recall (DTR), Index of Sensitivity of Cueing (ISC), number of intrusions. This study confirms the effect of age and education, but not of gender on immediate and delayed free and cued recall. The Italian version of the FCSRT-16 can be useful for both clinical and research purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1134
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A normative study of the Italian printed word version of the free and cued selective reminding test
    Girtler, N.
    De Carli, F.
    Amore, M.
    Arnaldi, D.
    Bosia, L. E.
    Bruzzaniti, C.
    Cappa, S. F.
    Cocito, L.
    Colazzo, G.
    Ghio, L.
    Magi, E.
    Mancardi, G. L.
    Nobili, F.
    Pardini, M.
    Picco, A.
    Rissotto, R.
    Serrati, C.
    Brugnolo, A.
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 36 (07) : 1127 - 1134
  • [2] Free and cued selective reminding test: an Italian normative study
    Frasson, P.
    Ghiretti, R.
    Catricala, E.
    Pomati, S.
    Marcone, A.
    Parisi, L.
    Rossini, P. M.
    Cappa, S. F.
    Mariani, C.
    Vanacore, N.
    Clerici, F.
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 32 (06) : 1057 - 1062
  • [3] Free and cued selective reminding test: an Italian normative study
    P. Frasson
    R. Ghiretti
    E. Catricalà
    S. Pomati
    A. Marcone
    L. Parisi
    P. M. Rossini
    S. F. Cappa
    C. Mariani
    N. Vanacore
    F. Clerici
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2011, 32 : 1057 - 1062
  • [4] Erratum to: Free and cued selective reminding test: an Italian normative study
    P. Frasson
    R. Ghiretti
    E. Catricalà
    S. Pomati
    A. Marcone
    L. Parisi
    P. M. Rossini
    S. F. Cappa
    C. Mariani
    N. Vanacore
    F. Clerici
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2012, 33 : 481 - 481
  • [5] Free and cued selective reminding test (FCSRT): A Tunisian normative study
    Bouattour, N.
    Farhat, N.
    Hadjkacem, H.
    Hdiji, O.
    Dammak, M.
    Mhiri, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 381 : 846 - 846
  • [6] Free and cued selective reminding test: an Italian normative study (vol 32, pg 1057, 2011)
    Frasson, P.
    Ghiretti, R.
    Catricala, E.
    Pomati, S.
    Marcone, A.
    Parisi, L.
    Rossini, P. M.
    Cappa, S. F.
    Mariani, C.
    Vanacore, N.
    Clerici, F.
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 33 (02) : 481 - 481
  • [7] Word and Picture Version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT): Is There Any Difference?
    Arighi, Andrea
    Carandini, Tiziana
    Mercurio, Matteo
    Carpani, Giovanni
    Pietroboni, Anna Margherita
    Fumagalli, Giorgio
    Ghezzi, Laura
    Basilico, Paola
    Calvi, Alberto
    Scarioni, Marta
    De Riz, Milena
    Fenoglio, Chiara
    Scola, Elisa
    Triulzi, Fabio
    Galimberti, Daniela
    Scarpini, Elio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2018, 61 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [8] Development, equivalence study, and normative data of version B of the Spanish-language Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test
    Grau-Guinea, L.
    Perez-Enriquez, C.
    Garcia-Escobar, G.
    Arrondo-Elizaran, C.
    Pereira-Cutino, B.
    Florido-Santiago, M.
    Pique-Candini, J.
    Planas, A.
    Paez, M.
    Pena-Casanova, J.
    Sanchez-Benavides, G.
    [J]. NEUROLOGIA, 2021, 36 (05): : 353 - 360
  • [9] Preliminary analysis of a shortened picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test
    Rodrigo-Herrero, S.
    Mendez-Barrio, C.
    Sanchez-Arjona, M. Bernal
    de Miguel-Tristancho, M.
    Graciani-Cantisan, E.
    Carnero-Pardo, C.
    Franco-Macias, E.
    [J]. NEUROLOGIA, 2022, 37 (03): : 192 - 198
  • [10] Validation and Norms for a Recognition Task for the Spanish Version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test
    Bonete-Lopez, Beatriz
    Oltra-Cucarella, Javier
    Marin, Marta
    Anton, Carolina
    Balao, Nerea
    Lopez, Elena
    Macia, Esther Sitges
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 36 (06) : 954 - 964