Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study

被引:1
|
作者
Ota, Mitsutoshi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Motomiya, Makoto [1 ]
Watanabe, Naoya [1 ]
Shimoda, Kohei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Norimasa [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Obihiro Kosei Hosp Hand Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nishi 14 Minami 10, Obihiro 0800024, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sapporo, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sapporo, Japan
关键词
Trauma; Lower leg; Soft tissue reconstruction; Free flap; Perforator flap; Propeller flap; LOWER-LIMB RECONSTRUCTION; LOWER-EXTREMITY; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; COVERAGE; DEFECTS; TIBIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07433-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The efficacy and safety of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) versus free flaps (FF) in traumatic lower leg and foot reconstructions are debated. PPFs are perceived as simpler due to advantages like avoiding microsurgery, but concerns about complications, such as flap congestion and necrosis, persist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of PPF and FF in trauma-related distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction.Methods We retrospectively studied 38 flaps in 33 patients who underwent lower leg and foot soft tissue reconstruction due to trauma at our hospital from 2015 until 2022. Flap-related outcomes and complications were compared between the PPF group (18 flaps in 15 patients) and the FF group (20 flaps in 18 patients). These included complete and partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, delayed osteomyelitis, and the coverage failure rate, defined as the need for secondary flaps due to flap necrosis.Results The coverage failure rate was 22% in the PPF group and 5% in the FF group, with complete necrosis observed in 11% of the PPF group and 5% of the FF group, and partial necrosis in 39% of the PPF group and 10% of the FF group, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, venous congestion was significantly higher in 72% of the PPF group compared to 10% of the FF group. Four PPFs and one FF required FF reconstruction due to implant/fracture exposure from necrosis. Additionally, four PPFs developed delayed osteomyelitis post-healing, requiring reconstruction using free vascularized bone graft in three out of four cases.Conclusions Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg defects can lead to reconstructive failure, exposing implants or fractures and potentially causing catastrophic outcomes like osteomyelitis, jeopardizing limb salvage. Surgeons should be cautious about deeming PPFs as straightforward and microsurgery-free procedures, given the increased complication rates compared to FFs in traumatic reconstruction.Data access statement The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Retrospective Analysis in Lower Limb Reconstruction: Propeller Perforator Flaps versus Free Flaps
    Cajozzo, Marta
    Toia, Francesca
    Innocenti, Alessandro
    Tripoli, Massimiliano
    Zabbia, Giovanni
    D'Arpa, Salvatore
    Cordova, Adriana
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2017, 33 : S34 - S39
  • [2] Clinical Applications of Perforator-Based Propeller Flaps in Upper Limb Soft Tissue Reconstruction
    Ono, Shimpei
    Sebastin, Sandeep J.
    Yazaki, Naoya
    Hyakusoku, Hiko
    Chung, Kevin C.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 36A (05): : 853 - 863
  • [3] Combined versus Single Perforator Propeller Flaps for Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Bigdeli, Amir K.
    Didzun, Oliver
    Thomas, Benjamin
    Harhaus, Leila
    Gazyakan, Emre
    Horch, Raymund E.
    Kneser, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [4] Comparative analysis of propeller flaps vs. modified perforator-based flaps in foot and ankle reconstruction
    Rajkumar, R.
    Sharma, Harish Kumar
    Dash, Suvashis
    Babu, Vaddi Suman
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 44 (02) : 243 - 248
  • [5] Comparative analysis of propeller flaps vs. modified perforator-based flaps in foot and ankle reconstruction
    Rajkumar R
    Harish Kumar Sharma
    Suvashis Dash
    Vaddi Suman Babu
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2021, 44 : 243 - 248
  • [6] Perforator Pedicled Propeller Flaps for Soft Tissue Coverage of Lower Leg and Foot Defects
    Dong, Kai-xuan
    Xu, Yong-qing
    Fan, Xin-yu
    Xu, Long-jiang
    Su, Xi-xiong
    Long, Hai
    Xu, Li-qi
    He, Xiao-qing
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 6 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [7] Perforator-based propeller flaps reliability in upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction: a systematic review
    Vitse, J.
    Bekara, F.
    Bertheuil, N.
    Sinna, R.
    Chaput, B.
    Herlin, C.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2017, 42 (02) : 157 - 164
  • [8] The Clinical Outcome of Perforator Based Sural Artery and Propeller Flaps in Reconstruction of Soft Tissue of Extremities
    Dhua, Subha
    Manashree, Sankhe
    Tilak, Bal Gangadhar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 8 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [9] Reconstruction of diabetic lower leg and foot soft tissue defects using thoracodorsal artery perforator chimeric flaps
    Sung, Il Hoon
    Jang, Dong Woo
    Kim, Se Wan
    Kim, Youn Hwan
    Kim, Sang Wha
    MICROSURGERY, 2018, 38 (06) : 674 - 681
  • [10] A Study of Clinical Applications of Perforator-Based Propeller Flaps in Leg Reconstructive Surgery: A Single-Center Experience of 40 Cases
    Shahabuddin, Shahab Faria
    Khurram, Mohammed Fahud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOWER EXTREMITY WOUNDS, 2020, 19 (01): : 70 - 77