Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods

被引:0
|
作者
Fiona R. Ronk
Geoffrey R. Hooke
Andrew C. Page
机构
[1] The University of Western Australia,School of Psychology
[2] Perth Clinic,undefined
来源
关键词
Clinical significance; Validity; Outcomes; Recovery; Quality of life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods
    Ronk, Fiona R.
    Hooke, Geoffrey R.
    Page, Andrew C.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 16
  • [2] Comparison of false positive and false negative rates of two indices of individual reliable change: Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods
    Ferrer-Urbina, Rodrigo
    Pardo, Antonio
    Arrindell, Willem A.
    Puddu-Gallardo, Giannina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [3] CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE - JACOBSON AND TRUAX (1991) REVISITED
    SPEER, DC
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 60 (03) : 402 - 408
  • [4] A comparison of three methods of identifying reliable and clinically significant client changes: commentary on Hageman and Arrindell
    Hsu, LM
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1999, 37 (12) : 1195 - 1202
  • [6] An Examination of the Criterion-Related Validity of Varying Methods of Indexing Clinically Significant Change in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment
    Benfer, Natasha
    Darnell, Benjamin C.
    Rusowicz-Orazem, Luke
    Fielstein, Elliot M.
    Grunthal, Breanna
    Lehavot, Keren
    Marx, Brian P.
    Litz, Brett
    PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2024, 16 (05) : 802 - 809