Innovation intermediaries revised: a systematic literature review on innovation intermediaries’ role for knowledge sharing

被引:0
|
作者
Daniel Feser
机构
[1] Georg-August University of Goettingen,Chair for Economic Policy and SME Research
来源
关键词
Innovation intermediaries; Knowledge-sharing; Systematic literature review; Innovation systems; 91C99;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The decision to collaborate for companies in knowledge exchange processes has become more complex due to a greater diversity of innovation intermediaries from companies, universities, government and societal actors. The aim of this study is to uncover and conceptualize the role of innovation intermediaries in knowledge sharing. Specifically in tacit knowledge sharing, intermediaries function as boundary spanners between various stakeholders in the innovation process. Despite this potential, which has been discussed in a large strand of case studies, there is no comprehensive concept to determine factors that influence innovation intermediaries in knowledge sharing. This paper develops an analytical framework of innovation intermediaries for prospective empirical work building on factors influencing innovation intermediaries in knowledge sharing by systematically reviewing related literature. It specifically presents what are the determinants, factors and indicators discussed empirically innovation intermediaries in knowledge sharing. The first results is that the measurement of innovative outcome intermediaries enables a broader perspective in comparison to traditional innovation indicators. The second results that literature discusses indirect innovation that enhances clients’ innovative capabilities and their entrepreneurial activities. The third results demonstrates, that while the internal perspective varies with the heterogeneous actors, the development of contextual knowledge of intermediaries in networks and its transfer is central for empirical analysis. The conceptualization of this framework paves the path for further research needed to uncover the role of intermediaries.
引用
收藏
页码:1827 / 1862
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Innovation intermediaries revised: a systematic literature review on innovation intermediaries' role for knowledge sharing
    Feser, Daniel
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 17 (05) : 1827 - 1862
  • [2] Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
    Howells, Jeremy
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (05) : 715 - 728
  • [3] Knowledge Metamodel For Crowdsourcing Innovation Intermediaries
    Silva, Candida
    Ramos, Isabel
    [J]. CREATING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: A 360-DEGREE APPROACH, VOLS 1-4, 2011, : 2099 - 2110
  • [4] Innovation search: the role of innovation intermediaries in the search process
    Howells, Jeremy
    Thomas, Elisa
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2022, 52 (05) : 992 - 1008
  • [5] Knowledge Sharing, Innovation Strategy and Innovation Capability: A Systematic Literature Review
    Wibowo, Mufti Agung
    Widodo
    Fachrunnisa, Olivia
    Adhiatma, Ardian
    Nugroho, Marno
    Prabowo, Yulianto
    [J]. COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS, CISIS-2021, 2021, 278 : 473 - 483
  • [6] Linking Entities in Knowledge Transfer: The Innovation Intermediaries
    Abbate, Tindara
    Coppolino, Raffaella
    Schiavone, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2013, 4 (03) : 233 - 243
  • [7] INTERMEDIARIES, INNOVATION, AND CHANGE
    SIBERY, DE
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1970, 8 (06) : 439 - 441
  • [8] Innovation ambidexterity and public innovation Intermediaries: The mediating role of capabilities
    De Silva, Muthu
    Howells, Jeremy
    Khan, Zaheer
    Meyer, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 149 : 14 - 29
  • [9] Collaboration for Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: The Role of Intermediaries
    Sultana, Nasrin
    Turkina, Ekaterina
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [10] The Role of Cluster Intermediaries for KIBS' Resources and Innovation
    Bocquet, Rachel
    Brion, Sebastien
    Mothe, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 54 : 256 - 277