Impacts of energy intensity target constraint on elasticity of substitution between production factors in China

被引:0
|
作者
Feng Wang
Xiying Liu
David M. Reiner
Ruiqi Wang
机构
[1] Xi’an Jiaotong University,School of Economics and Finance
[2] Independent Energy Economist,Energy Policy Research Group, Judge Business School
[3] University of Cambridge,undefined
来源
Energy Efficiency | 2021年 / 14卷
关键词
Elasticity of substitution; Energy intensity; Target constraint; Production factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China has implemented the energy intensity target (EIT) constraint policy to improve its energy efficiency for more than three decades. Producers in China need to consider factor prices, outputs, and EIT constraint while they plan the number of input factors. Therefore, this article brings the EIT into the conditional input demand function of an input factor and assesses the impacts of the elasticity of substitution between different production factors. By building two-factor substitution elasticity models with and without EIT constraints, this paper examines the impacts of EIT constraint on the elasticity of substitution between input factors in both the fossil fuel production sector and the non-fossil-fuel production sector. The main conclusions are, firstly, EIT constraint influences both own-price elasticity of an input factor and cross-price elasticity between different input factors. Secondly, EIT constraint hinders the responses of some input factors to the price changes of other input factors, and changes relationships between some input factors from complementary to substitute, or vice versa. Two policy implications are obtained. First, producers should consider the impacts of EIT constraint on their investment, labor input, energy input, and raw materials purchase and bring these impacts into their business strategies. Second, reducing energy input by changing prices of other production factors will be ineffective under EIT constraint.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impacts of energy intensity target constraint on elasticity of substitution between production factors in China
    Wang, Feng
    Liu, Xiying
    Reiner, David M.
    Wang, Ruiqi
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2021, 14 (03)
  • [2] Elasticity of factor substitution and driving factors of energy intensity in China's industry
    Wang, Feng
    Jiang, Yijie
    Zhang, Wulin
    Yang, Fang
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 30 (03) : 385 - 407
  • [3] Assessment of the economic impacts of continuous energy intensity target constraint in China: Based on an analytical general equilibrium model
    Wang, Feng
    Liu, Xiying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 197 - 210
  • [4] The economic and environment impacts of energy intensity target constraint: Evidence from low carbon pilot cities in China
    Pan, Xiongfeng
    Xu, Haitao
    Feng, Shenghan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [5] The threshold effects of energy efficiency on the elasticity of substitution between energy and non-energy factors
    Zha, Donglan
    He, Jinjin
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2017, 10 (04) : 873 - 885
  • [6] The threshold effects of energy efficiency on the elasticity of substitution between energy and non-energy factors
    Donglan Zha
    Jinjin He
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2017, 10 : 873 - 885
  • [7] The role of energy efficiency improvement and energy substitution in achieving China's carbon intensity target
    Weng, Yuyan
    Zhang, Xiliang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 : 2786 - 2790
  • [8] Uncertainty of substitution elasticity of China's production function
    Zheng, ZN
    Liu, DS
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT - A WORLD OF CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 411 - 416
  • [9] Industrial energy substitution and a revised Allen elasticity in China
    Lu Chengjun
    Zhou Duanming
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF ECONOMICS IN CHINA, 2009, 4 (01) : 110 - 124
  • [10] Substitution possibilities and determinants of energy intensity for China
    Ma, Hengyun
    Oxley, Les
    Gibson, John
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) : 1793 - 1804