Towards a better understanding of the characteristics of fractal networks

被引:0
|
作者
Enikő Zakar-Polyák
Marcell Nagy
Roland Molontay
机构
[1] Budapest University of Technology and Economics,Department of Stochastics, Institute of Mathematics
[2] ELKH-BME Stochastics Research Group,undefined
来源
关键词
Fractal networks; Network models; Structural properties; Small world; Assortativity; Betweenness centrality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The fractal nature of complex networks has received a great deal of research interest in the last two decades. Similarly to geometric fractals, the fractality of networks can also be defined with the so-called box-covering method. A network is called fractal if the minimum number of boxes needed to cover the entire network follows a power-law relation with the size of the boxes. The fractality of networks has been associated with various network properties throughout the years, for example, disassortativity, repulsion between hubs, long-range-repulsive correlation, and small edge betweenness centralities. However, these assertions are usually based on tailor-made network models and on a small number of real networks, hence their ubiquity is often disputed. Since fractal networks have been shown to have important properties, such as robustness against intentional attacks, it is in dire need to uncover the underlying mechanisms causing fractality. Hence, the main goal of this work is to get a better understanding of the origins of fractality in complex networks. To this end, we systematically review the previous results on the relationship between various network characteristics and fractality. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis of these relations on five network models and a large number of real-world networks originating from six domains. We clarify which characteristics are universally present in fractal networks and which features are just artifacts or coincidences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards a better understanding of the characteristics of fractal networks (vol 8, 17, 2023)
    Zakar-Polyak, Eniko
    Nagy, Marcell
    Molontay, Roland
    [J]. APPLIED NETWORK SCIENCE, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [2] Towards a better understanding of honeycomb alternating magnetic networks
    Marino, Nadia
    Armentano, Donatella
    De Munno, Giovanni
    Lloret, Francesc
    Cano, Joan
    Julve, Miguel
    [J]. DALTON TRANSACTIONS, 2015, 44 (24) : 11040 - 11051
  • [3] Towards better understanding of the behaviour of Bluetooth networks distributed algorithms
    Jedda, Ahmed
    Jourdan, Guy-Vincent
    Zaguia, Nejib
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARALLEL EMERGENT AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (06) : 563 - 586
  • [4] Towards a better understanding
    Howarth, I
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 44 (05) : 7 - 7
  • [5] TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING
    CLARKE, R
    [J]. MILK INDUSTRY, 1980, 82 (04): : 37 - 39
  • [6] Towards a better understanding of the methodological characteristics of engineering design research
    Horvath, Imre
    Duhovnik, Joze
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2005, VOL 3, PTS A AND B, 2005, : 905 - 919
  • [7] Towards a Better Understanding of Software Features and Their Characteristics: A Case Study of Marlin
    Krueger, Jacob
    Gu, Wanzi
    Shen, Hui
    Mukelabai, Mukelabai
    Hebig, Regina
    Berger, Thorsten
    [J]. TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VARIABILITY MODELLING OF SOFTWARE-INTENSIVE SYSTEMS (VAMOS 2018), 2017, : 105 - 112
  • [8] Towards a better understanding of the ROGUE
    Monet, F.
    Lorre, P.
    Boisvert, J-S
    Lambin-Iezzi, V.
    Kashyap, Raman
    [J]. SEVENTH EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL FIBRE SENSORS (EWOFS 2019), 2019, 11199
  • [9] Towards Better Understanding QBism
    Khrennikov, Andrei
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (01) : 181 - 195
  • [10] Towards A Better Understanding of Metonymy
    Li, Ke
    Li, Shukang
    [J]. METAPHOR AND SYMBOL, 2021, 36 (03) : 146 - 149