Essential elements to "design for dissemination" within a research network-a modified Delphi study of the Community-Academic Aging Research Network (CAARN)

被引:0
|
作者
Pinzon, Maria C. Mora [1 ,2 ]
Myers, Shannon [3 ]
Renken, Jill [3 ]
Eggert, Erin [3 ]
Chewning, Betty [4 ]
Mahoney, Jane E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med, Div Geriatr & Gerontol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Wisconsin Inst Hlth Aging, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Pharm, Madison, WI USA
来源
关键词
Implementation science; Purveyor; Community participation; Community-based participatory research; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; LESSONS; HEALTH; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSENSUS; PROGRAM; PBRNS;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-021-00122-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Community-Academic Aging Research Network (CAARN) was developed in 2010 to build partnerships, facilitate research, and ultimately accelerate the pace of development, testing, and dissemination of evidence-based programs related to healthy aging. CAARN has facilitated development and testing of 32 interventions, two of which are being packaged for scale-up, and three of which are being scaled up nationally by non-profit organizations. The purpose of this study is to describe CAARN's essential elements required to replicate its success in designing for dissemination.Methods We conducted a modified Delphi technique with 31 participants who represented CAARN's organization (staff and Executive Committee) and academic and community partners. Participants received three rounds of a web-based survey to rate and provide feedback about the importance of a list of potential key elements compiled by the authors. The criterion for establishing consensus was 80% of responses to consider the element to be extremely or very important.Results Response rate was 90% in Round 1, 82% in Round 2, and 87% in Round 3. A total of 115 items were included across rounds. Overall, consensus was achieved in 77 (67%) elements: 8 of 11 elements about academic partners, 8 of 11 about community partners, 29 of 49 about the role of the community research associate, 16 of 21 about the role of the director, 9 of 17 about the purveyor (i.e., the organization that scales up an intervention with fidelity), and 7 of 7 about the overall characteristics of the network.Conclusions The development of evidence-based programs designed for dissemination requires the involvement of community partners, the presence of a liaison that facilitates communications among academic and community stakeholders and a purveyor, and the presence of a pathway to dissemination through a relationship with a purveyor. This study delineates essential elements that meet the priorities of adopters, implementers, and end-users and provide the necessary support to community and academic partners to develop and test interventions with those priorities in mind. Replication of these key elements of the CAARN model may facilitate quicker development, testing, and subsequent dissemination of evidence-based programs that are feasible to implement by community organizations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] The Community-Academic Aging Research Network: A Pipeline for Dissemination
    Mahoney, Jane E.
    Pinzon, Maria Mora
    Myers, Shannon
    Renken, Jill
    Eggert, Erin
    Palmer, Will
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (06) : 1325 - 1333
  • [2] Design and methodology in a community, practice-based research network: a study of nurse-midwifery home-birth practice
    Murphy, PA
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 1998, 14 (03) : 155 - 161
  • [3] User-Friendly Data-Sharing Practices for Fostering Collaboration within a Research Network: Roles of a Vanguard Center for a Community-Based Study
    Lee, Jae Eun
    Sung, Jung Hye
    Barnett, M. Edwina
    Norris, Keith
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (01)
  • [4] Pharmacological long-term treatment strategies in first episode schizophrenia: Study design and preliminary results of an ongoing RCT within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia
    Gaebel W.
    Möller H.-J.
    Buchkremer G.
    Ohmann C.
    Riesbeck M.
    Wölwer W.
    Von Wilmsdorff M.
    Bottlender R.
    Klingberg S.
    [J]. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2004, 254 (2) : 129 - 140
  • [5] Healthier Lives Implementation Research Network for Māori and Pacific community health providers in Aotearoa New Zealand: a study protocol with an observational mixed methods design
    Oetzel, John
    Sika-Paotonu, Dianne
    Penetito-Hemara, Darrio
    Henry, Akarere
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [6] Phase I/II study of R-ICE (rituximab-ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide) with lenalidomide (R2-ICE) in patients with first-relapse/primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in academic and community cancer research united (ACCRU) network.
    Guerra-Bauman, Francis
    LaPlant, Betsy
    Macon, William R.
    Witzig, Thomas E.
    Farooq, Umar
    Nowakowski, Grzegorz S.
    Feldman, Tatyana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)