Effects of Soil Physicochemical Properties on Maize, Wheat, and Soybean Yields in Maize-Wheat and Maize-Soybean Intercropping Systems in China: a Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Wenjia Qi
Qi Wang
Erastus Mak-Mensah
Jinhui Zhu
Dengkui Zhang
Xujiao Zhou
Xiaole Zhao
Yanhua Xu
Yuanwei Sun
Qinglin Liu
Xiaoling Li
Xuchun Li
机构
[1] Gansu Agricultural University,College of Grassland Science
[2] Gansu Agricultural University,State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science
[3] Gansu Agricultural University,College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering
[4] Dingxi Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,undefined
关键词
Intercropping; Maize; Meta-analysis; Soybean; Wheat; Yield;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Intercropping has demonstrated its potential to boost crop yields and optimize land utilization in numerous instances. Yet, the specific mechanisms underlying the enhancement of intercropped plants’ relationships through improved crop management practices remain unclear. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of multiple studies across diverse regions to gain deeper insights into the impact of intercropping systems on crop yields. This investigation explored the influence of various factors, including different intercropping strategies, patterns of rainfall and temperature, and soil nutrient levels, on the production of maize, soybeans, and wheat crops. To quantify the magnitude of these effects, we employed the odds ratio as the effect size metric. Our findings reveal that, in regions with rainfall amounts of ≤ 200 mm, maize yields in both maize-wheat and maize-soybean intercropping systems were significantly affected (p = 0.0002) compared to regions with higher rainfall. This effect may be attributed to the substantial positive effect size observed when temperatures were below 11 °C, measuring 3037.55 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 2347.71 to 3727.40, as opposed to temperatures above 11 °C, which had an effect size of 671.55 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 241.40 to 1101.69. Additionally, maize yields were significantly higher (p = 0.0007) in sandy loam soils compared to silty clay loam and clay loam soils within the maize-wheat intercropping system, in contrast to maize monoculture. Furthermore, our study found that maize yields in a maize-wheat intercropping system significantly improved (p = 0.0008) in regions with soil bulk density ≤ 1.33 g cm−3 compared to regions with bulk density > 1.33 g cm−3. Notably, both the maize-wheat and maize-soybean intercropping systems exhibited significant yield advantages when compared to conventional monoculture of maize. This study underscores the optimum performance of the maize-wheat intercropping system, thus establishing it as a highly suitable agricultural approach. This innovative farming method contributes to sustainability, particularly in semiarid regions, and holds great promise for improving crop productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Soil Physicochemical Properties on Maize, Wheat, and Soybean Yields in Maize-Wheat and Maize-Soybean Intercropping Systems in China: a Meta-analysis
    Qi, Wenjia
    Wang, Qi
    Mak-Mensah, Erastus
    Zhu, Jinhui
    Zhang, Dengkui
    Zhou, Xujiao
    Zhao, Xiaole
    Xu, Yanhua
    Sun, Yuanwei
    Liu, Qinglin
    Li, Xiaoling
    Li, Xuchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 24 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [2] Water use of intercropped species: Maize-soybean, soybean-wheat and wheat-maize
    Wang, Wei
    Li, Meng-Ying
    Gong, Dong-Shan
    Zhou, Rui
    Khan, Aziz
    Zhu, Ying
    Zhu, Hao
    Abrar, Muhammad
    Zhu, Shuang-Guo
    Wang, Bao-Zhong
    Song, Chao
    Xiong, You-Cai
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 269
  • [3] Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting
    Li, L
    Sun, JH
    Zhang, FS
    Li, XL
    Rengel, Z
    Yang, SC
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2001, 71 (03) : 173 - 181
  • [4] Comparative analysis of maize-soybean strip intercropping systems: a review
    Iqbal, Nasir
    Hussain, Sajad
    Ahmed, Zeeshan
    Yang, Feng
    Wang, Xiaochun
    Liu, Weiguo
    Yong, Taiwen
    Du, Junbo
    Shu, Kai
    Yang, Wenyu
    Liu, Jiang
    [J]. PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (02) : 131 - 142
  • [5] THE EFFECT OF MAIZE-SOYBEAN INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS ON A SET OF TECHNOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES
    Oner, F.
    Aykutlu, H. M.
    [J]. APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (02): : 2149 - 2165
  • [6] Effect of aboveground and belowground interactions on the intercrop yields in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems
    Yang, Feng
    Liao, Dunping
    Wu, Xiaoling
    Gao, Rencai
    Fan, Yuanfang
    Raza, Muhammad Ali
    Wang, Xiaochun
    Yong, Taiwen
    Liu, Weiguo
    Liu, Jiang
    Du, Junbo
    Shu, Kai
    Yang, Wenyu
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2017, 203 : 16 - 23
  • [7] Border row effects on the distribution of root and soil resources in maize-soybean strip intercropping systems
    Shen, Lei
    Wang, Xiuyuan
    Liu, Tingting
    Wei, Wenwen
    Zhang, Shuai
    Keyhani, Abdul Baess
    Li, Luhua
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2023, 233
  • [8] Maize-soybean intercropping increases soil nutrient availability and aggregate stability
    Lu, Mei
    Zhao, Jixia
    Lu, Zerang
    Li, Mingjiang
    Yang, Jifen
    Fullen, Michael
    Li, Yongmei
    Fan, Maopan
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 2023,
  • [9] Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems
    Liu, Xin
    Rahman, Tanzeelur
    Song, Chun
    Su, Benying
    Yang, Feng
    Yong, Taiwen
    Wu, Yushan
    Zhang, Cuiying
    Yang, Wenyu
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2017, 200 : 38 - 46
  • [10] Effect of shading on accumulation of soybean isoflavonoid under maize-soybean strip intercropping systems
    Yang, Caiqiong
    Hu, Baoyu
    Iqbal, Nasir
    Yang, Feng
    Liu, Wei-guo
    Wang, Xiao-chun
    Yong, Tai-wen
    Zhang, Jing
    Yang, Wen-yu
    Liu, Jiang
    [J]. PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 21 (03) : 193 - 202