Interface Shear Strengths Between Geosynthetics and Clayey Soils

被引:24
|
作者
Chai J.-C. [1 ]
Saito A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Saga University, Honjo 1, Saga
关键词
Bentonite; Clayey soil; Direct shear test; Geosynthetics; Interface shear strength;
D O I
10.1007/s40891-016-0060-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Interface shear behavior between geosynthetics and clayey soil was investigated by large scale direct shear tests. The interfaces investigated are geomembrane (GM) and clayey soil; GM and geotextile (GT); and GT encased geosynthetics clay liner (GCL) and clayey soil. For GM/clayey soil interfaces, a softer GM resulted in a higher apparent adhesion, and higher water content of the soil yielded lower interface strength. A GM/bentonite interface had a small friction angle of 3 –4° only. For all cases tested, the interface shear strength (τf) was lower than the shear strength of the corresponding soil (τfs), and the lowest τf/τfs ratio was about 0.55. For GM/GT interfaces, the stiffer a GM, the lower the interface shear strength. Also a GT with a woven slit film layer, which is smoother than a randomly aligned nonwoven fiber surface, had a lower interface shear strength. The moisture content of a cover silty soil layer also had a considerable effect on the interface shear strength. Higher water content of the cover soil promoted soil particles entering the openings of the GT and increased the strength. For GCL/clayey soil interfaces, increase the water content of the bentonite in the GCL, reduced the interface friction angle, but increased apparent adhesion. The ratios of τf/τfs was about 0.8–1.0, and it reduced with the increase of the water content of the bentonite and overburden pressure possibly due to migration of water from the GCL to the interface. © 2016, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interface friction between geosynthetics and soils and between different geosynthetics
    Blumel, W
    Brummermann, K
    GEOSYNTHETICS: APPLICATIONS, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 1996, : 209 - 216
  • [2] Modeling of interface shear behavior between geosynthetics
    Min-Woo See
    Jun-Boum Park
    Inn-Joon Park
    Moon-Kyung Chung
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2003, 7 (1) : 9 - 16
  • [3] Shear creep of clayey soils
    Meschyan S.R.
    Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2005, 42 (6) : 195 - 200
  • [4] Evaluation of interface shear strength between geosynthetics under wet condition
    Seo, M. W.
    Park, J. B.
    Park, I. J.
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2007, 47 (05) : 845 - 856
  • [5] Shear Characteristics of the Interface between Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Various Geosynthetics
    Wu, Jian-Qi
    Li, Lei
    Yuan, Guo-Hui
    Wu, Bin
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Li-Jun
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [6] Dynamic shear characteristics of interface between different geosynthetics and recycled concrete aggregate
    Wu J.
    Li L.
    Wang J.
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41 (01): : 279 - 287
  • [7] Development of displacement-softening model for interface shear behavior between geosynthetics
    Seo, MW
    Park, IJ
    Park, JB
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2004, 44 (06) : 27 - 38
  • [8] Freezing effect on shear strength of clayey soils
    Department of Applied Geology, Karlsruhe University, D-7500 Karlsruhe, Germany
    Appl Clay Sci, 1-2 (165-187):
  • [9] Investigating anisotropy in shear strength of clayey soils
    Attom, M. F.
    Al-Akhras, N. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 161 (05) : 269 - 273
  • [10] Freezing effect on shear strength of clayey soils
    Czurda, KA
    Hohmann, M
    APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE, 1997, 12 (1-2) : 165 - 187