Composition and conservation value of bird assemblages of urban 'habitat islands': Do pedestrian traffic and landscape variables exert an influence?

Urban forest fragments can potentially be 'habitat islands' for native birds, but pedestrian traffic could influence the composition and conservation value of their bird assemblages by reducing the representation of disturbance-sensitive species. Winter bird assemblages and pedestrian traffic rates were documented in twelve forested parks in suburban Melbourne, Australia. Native birds comprised 87% of sightings, but two exotic species were common. Bird species' distribution among the parks was significantly nested. However, park rank orders for bird assemblage nestedness and mean pedestrian traffic rate were not correlated and only one species' distribution was nested with respect to this variable. The observed correlation between park area and bird assemblage nestedness may have been partly due to passive sampling. Degree of isolation of parks influenced nestedness less than park area. Forested parks provided habitat for species that occur at intermediate to low densities in other suburban habitats and for ecological specialists otherwise rare in suburbia. Larger parks contained more species than, and many of the native species found in, smaller parks. However, smaller parks each had 25% of the native bird species inhabiting the suite of fragments and thus had both aesthetic value and some potential to enhance city-dwellers' awareness about biodiversity conservation.