Selection for litter size in pigs. II. Efficiency of closed and open selection lines*

被引:0
|
作者
Gérard Bolet
Jean-Pierre Bidanel
Louis Ollivier
机构
[1] Station d'amélioration génétique des animaux,Institut national de la recherche agronomique
[2] Station de génétique quantitative et appliquée,Institut national de la recherche agronomique
关键词
pigs; selection; litter size; open line; immigration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A selection experiment on litter size in the pig was carried on for seventeen generations in an Inra experimental herd. The founder population was made up of 10 males and 120 females from the Large White breed. Selection was first performed for ten generations in a closed line, compared to a control line derived from the same founder population. Selection was carried on within sire family on the total number of piglets born in the first two litters of the dam (TB1 + TB2). After ten generations, the selection criterion became dam TB1 only. The control line was then discontinued and a panel of frozen semen from the 11th generation boars was created for later comparisons. The selected line was opened to gilt daughters of hyperprolific boars and sows, at a rate of 1/8 per generation, and the same selection procedure was applied irrespective of the origin of the gilt. During the whole experiment, the number of ova shed (OS) and the number of live embryos (LE) at 30 days in the 3rd pregnancy were recorded. These two parts of the experiment were analysed using REML estimation of genetic parameters and a BLUP-Animal Model in order to estimate the responses to selection. Significant heritabilities for TB1, TB2, OS and LE were obtained, i.e. 0.10, 0.05, 0.43 and 0.19, respectively. Significant common environment variances and covariances were estimated for nearly all traits. Significantly positive BLUP responses per generation were observed from G0 to G17 for TB1 (+0.086), TB2 (+0.078), OS (+0.197) and LE (+0.157). However, the responses were 3- to 4-fold higher in the G12–G17 interval compared to G0–G11, and they were also in fair agreement with previous estimates based on standard least-squares procedures, using the control line and the control frozen semen panel. Since G11, the selection intensity was increased by nearly 80 p. cent compared to the previous generations, and the proportion of hyperprolific ancestry increased up to 65 p. cent in the sows of the last generation. The total genetic gain of about 1.4 piglets at birth per litter could be shared between a gain due to immigration, of about 0.8 piglets per litter, and a within-line selection gain of about 0.6 piglets. Thus by combining selection and immigration in the second part of the experiment, advantage could be taken from both the genetic superiority of the immigrants and the higher internal selection intensity made possible by immigration.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection for litter size in pigs. II. Efficiency of closed and open selection lines
    Bolet, G
    Bidanel, JP
    Ollivier, L
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2001, 33 (05) : 515 - 528
  • [2] Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines
    Holl, JW
    Johnson, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [3] Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs:: II.: Carcass, meat, and fat quality traits
    Estany, J
    Villalba, D
    Tor, M
    Cubiló, D
    Noguera, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 80 (10) : 2566 - 2573
  • [4] Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: II. Response to selection for litter size and correlated response to production traits
    Noguera, JL
    Varona, L
    Babot, D
    Estany, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 80 (10) : 2548 - 2555
  • [5] Selection on purebred and crossbred performance for litter size in pigs
    Bösch, M
    Röhe, R
    Looft, H
    Kalm, E
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2000, 43 (03): : 249 - 262
  • [6] Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs, using placental efficiency as a selection tool
    Wilson, ME
    Biensen, NJ
    Ford, SP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1999, 77 (07) : 1654 - 1658
  • [7] BENEFITS OF SELECTION FOR LITTER SIZE IN PIG DAM LINES
    WEBB, AJ
    BAMPTON, PR
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1988, 46 : 486 - 486
  • [8] Selection for an index of placental efficiency and litter size in swine
    Mesa, H.
    Safranski, T. J.
    Cammack, K. M.
    Lamberson, W. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 : 38 - 39
  • [9] Genetic selection of maternal lines and digestive efficiency in rabbits:: Long term selection for litter size at weaning versus hyper selection for reproductive longevity
    Pascual, J. J.
    Rodenas, E.
    Martinez, E.
    Cervera, C.
    Blas, E.
    Baselga, M.
    [J]. WORLD RABBIT SCIENCE, 2008, 16 (03) : 165 - 171
  • [10] The effect of inbreeding on litter size in Chicago miniature pigs.
    Jung, Y. -C.
    Oh, S. -H.
    See, M. T.
    del Rosario, T. E.
    Kim, Y. -B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 166 - 166