The aim of this paper is to present a constructive solution to Frege’s puzzle (largely limited to the mathematical context) based on type theory. Two ways in which an equality statement may be said to have cognitive significance are distinguished. One concerns the mode of presentation of the equality, the other its mode of proof. Frege’s distinction between sense and reference, which emphasizes the former aspect, cannot adequately explain the cognitive significance of equality statements unless a clear identity criterion for senses is provided. It is argued that providing a solution based on proofs is more satisfactory from the standpoint of constructive semantics.
机构:
Duke Edinburghs Award Int Assoc, 18 Buena Vista St, San Ignacio, Cayo, BelizeDuke Edinburghs Award Int Assoc, 18 Buena Vista St, San Ignacio, Cayo, Belize
Topsey, Cynthia Ellis
Ford, Anabel
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Santa Barbara, MesoAmer Res Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USADuke Edinburghs Award Int Assoc, 18 Buena Vista St, San Ignacio, Cayo, Belize
Ford, Anabel
Horn, Sherman
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Grand Valley State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Allendale, MI 49401 USADuke Edinburghs Award Int Assoc, 18 Buena Vista St, San Ignacio, Cayo, Belize