The Impact of Visual Displays on Learning Across the Disciplines: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Daibao Guo
Erin M. McTigue
Sharon D. Matthews
Wendi Zimmer
机构
[1] Boise State University,Department of Literacy, Language, & Culture
[2] University of Stavanger,Norwegian National Centre for Reading and Reading Research
[3] Texas A&M University,Department of Teaching, Learning, & Culture
来源
关键词
Graphics; Visual displays; Learning; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current systematic review aimed to investigate in what ways the incorporation of visual display tasks benefits K-12 students’ content-area learning. After screening 1693 articles at abstract level and a systematic evaluation of methodological quality, we synthesized 44 articles for this review. The qualitative synthesis of the studies is organized by categories of interaction with visual displays (ViDis), instructional support, and types of knowledge and learning. Overall findings indicate the simple inclusion of visual displays does not guarantee a positive learning effect. More detailed findings distinguish three categories of ViDis: author-provided, student-filled-in, and student-created visual displays. Furthermore, we discuss each category’s effectiveness for students’ learning. Additionally, findings on retention and information comprehension are mixed when students are either provided with ViDis or complete ViDis themselves. However, the integration of ViDis in K-12 classrooms indicate highly promising results for enhancing students’ higher-level learning (i.e., analyzing, evaluating, applying, and creating). Finally, we provided practical implications for K-12 teachers and recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 656
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Visual Displays on Learning Across the Disciplines: A Systematic Review
    Guo, Daibao
    McTigue, Erin M.
    Matthews, Sharon D.
    Zimmer, Wendi
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 32 (03) : 627 - 656
  • [2] Engineering Leadership Across Disciplines: A Systematic Literature Review
    Handley, Meg
    Plumblee, Jeff
    Tallman, Brett
    Novoselich, Brian
    Sullivan, Seth
    Kennedy, Tim
    Houghtalen, Lori
    Tan, May-Ling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 37 (02) : 311 - 324
  • [3] Learner : preceptor ratios for practice-based learning across health disciplines: a systematic review
    Loewen, Peter
    Legal, Michael
    Gamble, Allison
    Shah, Kieran
    Tkachuk, Stacey
    Zed, Peter
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 51 (02) : 146 - 157
  • [4] Implicit and Explicit Learning of a Covariation Across Visual Search Displays
    Ray, Colleen A.
    Reingold, Eyal M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2004, : 1125 - 1130
  • [6] Blended Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy
    Hannan, Shauna K.
    [J]. TEACHING THEOLOGY AND RELIGION, 2013, 16 : E22 - E23
  • [7] Blended Learning: Across the Disciplines, across the Academy
    Mandelbaum, Renee Sinow
    [J]. REVIEW OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 36 (03): : 424 - 425
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines
    Marusic, Ana
    Bosnjak, Lana
    Jeroncic, Ana
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [9] The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines
    Belbase, Shashidhar
    [J]. LEARNING AND TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION-GULF PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 13 (01):
  • [10] A systematic review of elephant impact across Africa
    Guldemond, Robert A. R.
    Purdon, Andrew
    van Aarde, Rudi J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):