False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing

被引:0
|
作者
Anjali Thapar
Kathleen B. McDermott
机构
[1] Bryn Mawr College,Department of Psychology
[2] Washington,Department of Psychology
[3] University,undefined
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2001年 / 29卷
关键词
Retention Interval; False Memory; Study List; Item Type; False Recognition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effects of retention interval and level of processing on false recall and false recognition of associates were examined. False recall and false recognition were induced by presenting subjects with words closely associated with a nonstudied word. Both level of processing and retention interval affected false recall (Experiment 1) and false recognition (Experiment 2) in the same direction with which they affected accurate recall and accurate recognition. That is, semantically processed lists exhibited higher levels of later false recall and false recognition than did superficially processed lists. Furthermore, a decline in false recall and false recognition occurred across retention intervals of 0, 2, and 7 days. However, the decline in false recall and false recognition was less pronounced than the decline in accurate recall and accurate recognition. Results are consistent with source monitoring and fuzzy trace explanations of false recall and false recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing
    Thapar, A
    McDermot, KB
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (03) : 424 - 432
  • [2] Revisiting the rise and fall of false recall: Presentation rate effects depend on retention interval
    Smith, Troy A.
    Kimball, Daniel R.
    [J]. MEMORY, 2012, 20 (06) : 535 - 553
  • [3] Modality effects in false recall and false recognition
    Gallo, DA
    McDermott, KB
    Percer, JM
    Roediger, HL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (02) : 339 - 353
  • [4] Effects of survival processing and retention interval on true and false recognition in the DRM and category repetition paradigms
    Parker, Andrew
    Dagnall, Neil
    Abelson, Ashley
    [J]. MEMORY, 2019, 27 (03) : 353 - 367
  • [5] ERP correlates of recognition memory: Effects of retention interval and false alarms
    Wolk, David A.
    Schacter, Daniel L.
    Lygizos, Melissa
    Sen, N. Mandu
    Holcomb, Phillip J.
    Daffner, Kirk R.
    Budson, Andrew E.
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1096 : 148 - 162
  • [6] RETENTION INTERVAL AND FALSE RECOGNITION OF IMPLICIT ASSOCIATIVE RESPONSES
    SAEGERT, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1971, 10 (05): : 511 - 515
  • [7] Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition
    John G. Seamon
    Chun R. Luo
    Jonathan J. Kopecky
    Catherine A. Price
    Leeatt Rothschild
    Nicholas S. Fung
    Michael A. Schwartz
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2002, 30 : 1054 - 1064
  • [8] Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition
    Seamon, JG
    Luo, CR
    Kopecky, JJ
    Price, CA
    Rothschild, L
    Fung, NS
    Schwartz, MA
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2002, 30 (07) : 1054 - 1064
  • [9] TYPE OF FALSE RECOGNITION AND LEVELS OF PROCESSING IN FREE-RECALL
    MUELLER, JH
    MARLER, M
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1977, 10 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [10] The effects of mediated word lists on false recall and recognition
    Mark J. Huff
    Keith A. Hutchison
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2011, 39 : 941 - 953